About Me

Name:Black Knight
Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Blog Roll

 

Obama says the General was out of line for criticizing Clinton

 
 

Obama-Backing General: Clinton Lacks "Moral Authority" Over Bosnia Gaffes

A key military surrogate for Barack Obama went after Hillary Clinton on the Bosnia story today -- triggering an accusation of hypocrisy from the Hillary camp in light of Obama's own words about the controversy during this week's debate, when he said people should let the story go.

"One of the inherent duties of the president of the United States is to lay a wreath at the Tomb of the Unknown Soldier on Memorial Day," said Gen. Walter Stewart on an Obama campaign conference call this afternoon -- then proceeding to lambast Hillary over the Bosnia gaffes. "Imagine the lack of moral authority she has now to lay a wreath at the Tomb of the Unknown Soldier on Memorial Day."

Clinton spokesman Phil Singer immediately pounced: "When it comes to negative campaign tactics, Senator Obama has been a hypocrite from day one, decrying attack politics from one side of his mouth while he and his campaign wage a character assassination effort from the other."

Obama spokesman Hari Sevugan disassociated the campaign from Stewart's remarks: "We obviously do not agree with that sentiment."
 
http://tpmelectioncentral.talkingpointsmemo.com/2008/04/obamabacking_general_clinton_l.php
 
Tags: Politics  
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Obama back on top in the Gallup daily

 
http://www.gallup.com/poll/106609/Gallup-Daily-Obama-Holds-Slight-47-45-Advantage.aspx?version=print

PRINCETON, NJ -- The peeling away of national Democratic support for Barack Obama seen this past week may have run its course. After trailing Hillary Clinton by one percentage point in Saturday's Gallup Poll Daily tracking report, Obama now leads Clinton by two points, 47% to 45%.

Tags: Politics  
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

How can one be a strict constructionist and a states righter, but now claim that Obama's State Senate work does not count!!!

 
 
How can Obama's eight years in the Illinois State Senate, where he passed an Earned Income Tax Credit for working families, expanded healthcare, and did ethics reform, among other things, be dismissed by the right wing?
 
For people who spent the last 50 years claiming to be strict constructionist, states righters, and at the extreme, claim that there is no higher law enforcement authority outside of the local sheriff, to now say that State politics has no relevance, strains credibility and the right should be ashamed of themselves.
Tags: Politics  
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

The Chapman hit against Obama-The Clinton-Clinton-Bush-Rove-Chapman Normandy ambush against Obama continues!!!

 
Daley embraced Ayers, but does Chapman attack the white man Daley? 
 
No, he only attacks the black man Obama.
 
Keep it up, press, the world can see your racism overflowing.
***
 
 

About Obama's Terrorist Acquaintance

When William F. Buckley Jr. died in February, one of the things widely praised, by liberals and others, was his stalwart insistence on moral hygiene. Even when his conservative movement was small and embattled, he rejected the temptation to join forces with anti-Semites, the John Birch Society and other extremists. Later, he disavowed longtime confederates Pat Buchanan and Joseph Sobran for the sin of bigotry.

Buckley knew the importance of choosing allies carefully. But some people who expect such care from conservatives don't practice it themselves.

Among many liberals, extremism in the defense of "social justice" is no vice. When the folk singer Pete Seeger got a medal by President Clinton, no one cared that he was a veteran apologist for Stalin who still regarded himself as a communist. That indifference betrayed a double standard that conscientious liberals should reject.

By that standard, Barack Obama is a liberal, but not a conscientious one. I don't much care if he declines to wear a flag pin; I can overlook his wife's limited capacity for patriotic pride; and I defended his relationship with his former pastor. But his comfortable association with an unrepentant former terrorist should induce queasiness in anyone who shares the humane values that Obama extols.
 
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/printpage/?url=http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2008/04/obamas_terrorist_connection.html
Tags: Politics  
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

This nails the type campaign the Clinton's have been running!!!

 
 

Nature of US politics put to the test

ANALYSIS: Andrew Sullivan | April 21, 2008

EVEN after all the hype, this week's vote in Pennsylvania will be a watershed primary election.

This isn't because it could determine whether Hillary Clinton's campaign continues on its brutal, nihilistic path towards the destruction of the most promising figure in the Democratic Party since Kennedy.

It isn't because it's been an age since the last primary vote and every nasty toxin in American culture has been drawn to the surface by the Clinton poultice.

It isn't even because Pennsylvania is an indisputably important and large state that any Democrat needs to win in November.

It is because the Clintons haveturned Pennsylvania into a microcosm of what they think the general election will be in November.

And the Clintons are running as the Rove Republicans. If they fail to destroy Barack Obama as effectively as Karl Rove -- George W. Bush's master of the dark arts -- destroyed Al Gore and John Kerry in 2000 and 2004, with tactics just as brutal but even more personal, then they will have driven American politics to a critical point. They will have shown that the paradigm that has reigned in US politics for at least two decades has been shattered.

That's what is being tested this week. It may be the most important vote in America until the final one, in November.

Obama has been pummelled by a Democrat in ways never witnessed in a primary campaign.

Hillary Clinton has argued he is less qualified to be commander-in-chief than the Republican nominee, John McCain. She has said she doesn't know for sure he is not a secret Muslim. She has said his choice of church is unacceptable to her. She has said he deliberately wants many Americans to continue scraping by without health insurance.

Her campaign has insinuated he was once a drug dealer. The Clintons have publicly associated Obama with domestic terrorist William Ayers, with the militant Palestinian group Hamas and with anti-semitic demagogue Louis Farrakhan.

And what is remarkable about all this is most of it was not done by surrogates, but by her husband -- a former president against a senator in his own party -- and directly by Clinton herself.

In Pennsylvania, Clinton is running only negative advertisements designed to exploit Obama's gaffe a fortnight ago, when he described some rural Pennsylvanians as bitter, and as "clinging" to some traditional identities because they felt left out of economic and social change. It was a stupid comment, and Obama deserved a hit. But this is what the Clintons' ad says, voiced by several unidentified Pennsylvanians: "I was very insulted by Barack Obama." "It shows how out of touch Barack Obama is." "The good people of Pennsylvania deserve a lot better than what Barack Obama said."

This is a swing state. For the Clintons baldly to co-opt exactly the kind of anti-elitist rhetoric used to marginalise Democrats by Republicans for three decades is to take the campaign warfare to a new level of earth-scorching.

The ABC News debate last week could have been crafted by Rove. Every conceivable personal attack on Obama was aired by the moderators. Obama was asked if his failure to wear an American flag lapel pin at all times was a sign he didn't love America; if he was an elitist; if he secretly condoned domestic terrorism, on the grounds that an old 1960s Weather Underground radical sponsored a fundraiser for him.

On each occasion, Clinton jumped in to exploit the attacks by the ABC moderators. It was so brutal you almost looked away.

Obama wilted. He didn't punch back. He seemed exhausted, almost detached. I've seen him this way before, but never before 10million viewers in prime time. It was his worst performance yet.

Clinton grinned. There was almost a liberated sense in the Clinton camp that, finally, they had been able to do to a Democrat what Republicans had done to them for the past two decades: insinuate treason, lack of patriotism, elitist snobbery, counter-cultural deviance ...

This, the Clintonites tell us, is what the Republicans will do to Obama. The strategy is to persuade super delegates that only the Clinton brand can withstand Rove-style attacks. They are, of course, only doing this for the sake of their party, their country and the world.

Clinton, who had a 20-point lead until recently, should win Pennsylvania easily. But if Obama keeps her lead to single digits, if the momentum of the race does not change, that will show something else. It will show that the crisis the US is in now has made the kind of tactics of the past two decades moot. It will show that the issues of the Iraq occupation, the teetering economy, the unsustainable debt and the collapsing dollar are more salient than cultural identity. It will show that the voters want to debate something more than lapel pins. It will show we are in a new era.

Maybe we're not. Maybe the old politics and the old patterns have one more turn of the screw to go. That's the beauty of democracy. This week we will go a long way towards finding out.

The Sunday Times
 
http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/story/0,25197,23570034-26397,00.html
Tags: Politics  
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Rachel Maddow out debates Clinton supporter Joe Scarborough and runs him off the set!!!

 
Good for you Rachel!!!!
***

Joe Scarborough Walks Off MSNBC's "Race To The White House" After Exchange With Rachel Maddow

 Huffington Post   |   April 17, 2008 07:55 PM

Update from MSNBC spokesman Jeremy Gaines to Huffington Post:

"Joe didn't walk off. He chose not to participate in the final couple of minutes of the discussion because he felt the conversation didn't fit his role as a political analyst."

Previously:

Did Joe Scarborough walk out of David Gregory's show "Race to the White House" Thursday night on MSNBC? It seems that way by the video below. Joe was a panelist on the show along with Air America's Rachel Maddow, CNBC's John Harwood and former Tennessee Congressman Harold Ford, Jr.

The panel was discussing the effect of Sen. Obama's personal and professional relationships on his campaign when Rachel and Joe disagreed. Joe started to challenge Rachel's argument that relationships only become an issue when a political opponent makes them an issue, but she cut him off, "Let me make my point and then you can dismiss me." She then finished with an example of a McCain campaign co-chair in Florida's bathroom activities.

After a commercial break, Joe prefaced his rebuttal to Rachel's point by saying "I don't engage in Crossfire-type debates and certainly I don't want to talk about what people do in bathrooms." When he finished speaking, and after David Gregory had shut Joe vs. Rachel down, John Harrow came on camera. Then, viewers can hear Joe taking off his microphone (2:47 into the below video). When the panel picture came back, no Joe.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/04/17/joe-scarborough-walks-off_n_97330.html

Tags: Politics  
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

The Clinton-Bush-McCain-Sloan-Normandy Attack against Obama continues!!!

 
Thomas B. Edsall-Huffington Post-April 18, 2008

A high-ranking labor supporter of Hillary Clinton is distributing to union leaders and to Democratic strategists a document detailing the radical activities of Bill Ayers and Bernadine Dohrn, two former members of the '70s group the Weather Underground, who decades later, in Chicago, crossed paths with Barack Obama.

The document - a three-page emailed essay by Rick Sloan, communications director for the International Association of Machinists as Aerospace Workers (IAMAW) -- takes both literary and political license to outline what Sloan believes would be the thrust of a hypothetical Republican campaign against Obama focusing on his tangential connection to Ayers and Dohrn.

The goal of the essay appears to be to discredit Obama as the prospective Democratic presidential nominee.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/04/18/clinton-backer-distribute_n_97525.html
 
Tags: Politics  
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Hey Barone-Ayers is a friend of Mayor Daley's-Are you going after him also?-The Clinton-Bush-McCain-Barone-Normandy attack continues!!!

 
 
 

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2008/04/the_rules_change_for_obama.html

The Rules Change for Obama

By Michael Barone

Barack Obama seemed puzzled. Angrily puzzled. The apostle of hope seemed flummoxed by the audacity of the question. At the April 16 Philadelphia debate, George Stephanopoulos, longtime aide to Democratic politicians, was asking about his longtime association with Weather Underground bomber William Ayers.

The Weather Underground attacked the Pentagon, the Capitol and other public buildings; Ayers was quoted in The New York Times on Sept. 11, 2001, as saying, "I don't regret setting bombs; I feel we didn't do enough."

It was at Ayers' house that Obama's state Senate candidacy was launched in 1995; Obama continued to serve on a nonprofit board with Ayers after the Times article appeared.

Obamaites live-blogging the debate were outraged. The press is not supposed to ask such questions. They are supposed to invite the candidates to expatiate on how generous their health care plans are. Or to allow them to proclaim that "we are the change that we are seeking." Or to once again bash George W. Bush.

There was some of that in this debate. But Obama was asked about his association with the Rev. Jeremiah Wright, his remarks about wearing an American flag lapel pin, his comment that "bitter" small town Pennsylvanians "cling to guns and religion" and his "friendly" relations -- "friendly" is his campaign adviser David Axelrod's word -- with William Ayers.

Did Obama expect that this would never come up in the campaign? He certainly gave that impression. The normally poised candidate looked irritated and weary. "This is a guy who lives in my neighborhood, who's a professor of English" -- actually, it's education -- "in Chicago, who I know and who I have not received some official endorsement from. He's not somebody who I exchange ideas from on a regular basis. And the notion that somehow as a consequence of me knowing somebody who engaged in detestable acts 40 years ago when I was 8 years old, somehow reflects on me and my values, doesn't make much sense, George."

Tags: Politics  
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (2) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Kudlow blames Obama for blacks not having jobs!!!

 
World can you see why black people say that white people are mean?
 
Here Kudlow blames Obama who has never been President, for blacks not having jobs, while letting 44 white presidents off the hook.
 
This stuff is maddening!!!
 
 
"Jack Kemp has effectively made the point that African American communities desperately need capital in order to create new businesses and jobs. Yet as Obama takes the capital out of capitalism, all those who are not rich will be hurt when the rich folks with capital have less of it -- after tax -- to invest in those new businesses and new jobs.(JK)"
 
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2008/04/why_not_blame_obama.html
Tags: Politics  
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Black people-It is clear that Bush-Clinton-Clinton-McCain-Lieberman-ABC- are against Obama and all black people-What are we going to do when they steal the election?

 
 
Clinton-Clinton has an end game-Steal the election from Obama.
 
McCain-Bush-Lieberman have an end game-Help Clinton-Clinton steal the election from Obama.
 
The Democratic party has an end game-Let Clinton beat up and bloody Obama so that Clinton wins or McCain wins.  We know this to be true because if Clinton had the most delegates, the most states won, and lead in the popular vote, as Obama has, the Party would have asked Obama to step aside, or the super delegates would have thrown their selection to the white lady-Clinton by now.
 
Since they have not done so for the black man leader Obama, proves that their end game is to assist Clinton in stealing the election from Obama or to help McCain win.
 
Malcom X knew what he was talking about when he said the Democrats and Republicans were/are in "cohoots."  He was right.
 
 
Therefore, Black people what is our end game?
 
(1). After all these millions of votes and the expending all of this tremendous energy, will we once again accept like Jesse did, a prime time speaking slot at the convention?
 
(2). Is that all we are worth to the Democratic Party?
 
(3). Will we black people accept that?
 
(4).  The Party is counting on us to once again vote for the ticket and not vote for McCain.  The Party argues that a vote for McCain is a vote for more Scalias and Robertses.
 
I say that's the Party's problem.  The Supreme Court has not been relevant to black people since the Warren Court, so that argument should get no sympathy from us!!!
 
(5). The Party argues that a vote for McCain is a vote for a 100 year Iraq War.
 
I say that too is the Party's problem:  McCain will send their sons and daughters to die in the war.  Our sons and daughters are already over there dying.
 
I say welcome to the club!!!
 
(6). The Party says that if black people walk, the Party will be shatterd for the next 40 years, leading to Republican elections, recessions and depressions in the economy which will adversely affect black people more.
 
I say the Party ought to think about that before they steal this election.  Black people are already shattered- have been in a depression for the past 100 years; unemployment 4 or 5 times higher than whites; drop-out rate 6-7 times higher.  Nothing has changed. So don't blame us for destroying the Party.  Blame the lying cheating Clintons and those who enable them.
 
(7). Black people-will you be molified if Clinton steals the election and taps Obama as running mate?
 
I would say at that point that "principle is bigger than Obama."  If he joins the lies, the cheating, the thievery of the Clintons, then we would have to part company and wish him well.
 
JFK and Johnson did not like one another, but Kennedy did nothing to cheat against Johnson to win the nomination.
 
Bush called Reagan's policies "voodoo economics" but Reagan did nothing to cheat against Bush to win the nomination.
 
The Clintons are the lowest of the low-below the belt-gutter-lowest common denominator-treasonous-Never in the modern history of primaries has a Democratic challenger praised the Republican challenger over a fellow Democrat.  That alone should have brought all of the superdelgates over to Obama's side.
 
So if Obama wants to be on that stolen-treasonous ticket with Clinton, that's his business; that has nothing to do with black people.
 
At that point we would have to chart our own course; but I don't think Obama would do that; and I don't think Michelle would let Obama do that.  They appear to have too much integrity to be a part of the Clinton train-wreck-awaiting-to-happen Administration.
 
(8). So black people what is our end game?
 
(9). I would advise our end game to be this:
 
   Jesse, Al, The NAACP, The Urban League, All the Black Greek Organizations, all the young people brought to the polls by Obama; Rev Al and Jesse representing 35 million black people, and representatives of the young people, white, Hispanic, Asian and Native Americans representing at least another 35 million people, should go on national TV and announce right now, that if the Clintons steal this nomination, that he, Jesse, and Al will organize and lead 70 million Americans out of the Democratic Party and over to the Republican Party.
 
Say to the Party-intentionally destroy Obama and we will intentionally fight back.  Just like John Edwards said on another subject, "you can't reason with these people; you have to fight them power for power."
 
Some will say, isn't that black mail; if you don't do what black people want, we'll leave?
 
Only an idiot would say that.
 
We are saying conduct a fair election or we'll leave.
 
If the Clintons win fair and square we'll accept it; but if it is stolen, we are out of here!!!
 
I'd rather be in the pure _ell of the Republican Party, than to be in the pure _ell of so-called friends in the Democratic Party.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Tags: Politics  
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

The Clinton-Ignatius-Operation Overlord-Normandy attack gainst Obama continues!!!

 
  

Obama and the Chicago Insider

By David Ignatius

Sunday, April 20, 2008; Page B07

The trial of Barack Obama's wheeler-dealer friend, Antoin "Tony" Rezko, was back in the news last week because of a disagreement over whether Obama did or didn't attend a party at Rezko's house for an Iraqi-born billionaire named Nadhmi Auchi.

A prosecution witness testified that Obama and his wife were guests at the April 3, 2004, gathering in the Chicago suburb of Wilmette. The Obama campaign responded that neither of the Obamas recalled attending such an event. Auchi similarly has "no recollection of meeting Senator Obama at any party in 2004 or at any other time," according to his lawyer, Alasdair Pepper.

The testimony was a reminder of the vortex of business and politics swirling around Rezko -- and of Obama's curious 17-year friendship with the indicted Chicago businessman. The Clintons rightly have gotten hammered over the years for their friendships with political fixers. And although Obama complained in Wednesday night's debate about "distractions" in the campaign, his long association with Rezko is worth a careful look.

The mystery about the Rezko matter, for me, is why Obama stood by the Syrian-born businessman as his legal troubles mounted. The answer, near as I can tell, is the same one that emerged in the debate over inflammatory statements made by the Rev. Jeremiah Wright, Obama's former pastor. Obama remains doggedly loyal to his friends, especially those who embraced him when he first came to Chicago as a young man struggling to find his place in the world.

Obama met Rezko in the early 1990s as he was finishing up at Harvard Law School. Rezko was well connected in Chicago's African American community, in part because he had worked with Jabir Herbert Muhammad, the son of Nation of Islam founder Elijah Muhammad, when he was managing the career of boxer Muhammad Ali, according to a May 2005 profile in the Chicago Tribune.

 
 http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/04/18/AR2008041802707.html
Tags: Politics  
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Ethel Kennedy-Bobby's wife-backs Obama!!!

 
 
  

Barack Obama endorsed by Robert Kennedy's widow Ethel Kennedy

By Philip Sherwell

Last Updated: 4:25pm BST 19/04/2008

Ethel Kennedy, the matriarch of America's greatest political dynasty, is back on the campaign trail for the first time since an assassin’s bullet brutally ended the presidential run of her husband Robert 40 years ago.

# Full coverage of the US Elections 2008

# Trail Mix 2008: Media: Obama's not-so-secret weapon?

Just days after turning 80 on April 11, Mrs Kennedy was leading three generations of her family seeking votes across Pennsylvania for Barack Obama, a politician whose crowd-drawing ability and soaring rhetoric has often earned comparisons with both Robert, killed in June 1968, and his brother, President John F Kennedy, who was assassinated in 1963.

Robert Kennedy, Barack Obama

Barack Obama's oratory and charisma have drawn comparions with the Kennedy brothers

In her public endorsement of Mr Obama, Mrs Kennedy said: "Barack is so like Bobby...With courage, caring, and charisma, Senator Obama is leading us toward a kinder, gentler world."

After greeting residents of a senior citizens home in Scranton and leading a round of "Irish Eyes", she told The Sunday Telegraph: "He's such an inspiring man and he'll be a great president for our country.

"He's just what we need, a breath of fresh air." An energetic figure in blue blazer, grey trousers and pink scarf and sweater, she left the family compound in Hyannisport, Massachusetts, at dawn and flew to Pennsylvania for a long day of Get Out The Vote events at community centres, old people’s homes and college campuses. Long after dark, she was still shaking hands and urging people to vote for Mr Obama in Tuesday's primary.

And between campaign stops, she demonstrated a political mind as sharp as ever as she discussed singer Bruce Springsteen's endorsement of Mr Obama and tactics for a major Democratic dinner in the area this weekend.

Mrs Kennedy was accompanied in Scranton by two of her surviving nine children - son Max, 42, and daughter Rory, 39, with whom she was pregnant when Robert was shot dead - and Max's wife and his daughters, aged 13 and nine.

advertisement

"It's remarkable. I have never seen Mom so energised by an election. She really means this," said Max, an attorney and writer.

Information appearing on telegraph.co.uk is the copyright of Telegraph Media Group Limited and must not be reproduced in any medium without licence. For the full copyright statement see Copyright

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2008/04/19/wkennedy119.xml
 
Tags: Politics  
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

ABC is part of the Clinton Operation Overlord attack against Obama

 
 

Outrage as ex-Clinton staffer runs debate

ABC journalist Charles Gibson (centre) is under fire for his questions in the televised debate between senators Clinton and Obama.

ABC journalist Charles Gibson (centre) is under fire for his questions in the televised debate between senators Clinton and Obama.
Photo: Reuters

 
Lucy Battersby
April 17, 2008 - 2:36PM

US voters have expressed outrage over the decision to allow Bill Clinton's former press secretary to moderate today's debate between Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama.

The two Democratic senators went head-to-head in Philadelphia in the run-up to the Pennsylvania primary on April 22.

The debate was moderated by ABC journalists George Stephanopoulos, a former Clinton staffer, and Charles Gibson.

More than 7000 viewers posted comments on the American Broadcasting Corporation (ABC) news website criticising the "biased" and "superficial" questions posed by Stephanopoulos, the network's Washington correspondent.

Stephanopoulos helped run Mr Clinton's 1992 election campaign and acted as his press secretary and advisor on policy and strategy before joining the ABC.

"A very biased debate, both Charlie and George attacked Obama tonight," wrote Admiralboy21.

"George Stephanopoulos was on Bill Clinton's administrative staff at one point, why was he asking the questions. ABC did a TERRIBLE job with the debate!!"

Zorbakrufus wrote: "ABC News has officially lost any semblance of credibility it ever had for me.
 
http://www.theage.com.au/news/us-election/chair-lift-for-hillary/2008/04/17/1208025351372.html
Tags: Politics  
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

The ABC debate was slanted against Obama-Tom Shales

 
 
"To this observer, ABC's coverage seemed slanted against Obama. The director cut several times to reaction shots of such Clinton supporters as her daughter, Chelsea, who sat in the audience at the Kimmel Theater in Philly's National Constitution Center. Obama supporters did not get equal screen time, giving the impression that there weren't any in the hall.(TS)."
 
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/04/17/AR2008041700013.html
Tags: Politics  
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive