About Me

Name:Black Knight
Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Blog Roll

 

Hey "Smear Job" Hannity-The Rezko Trial Is Not About Obama, But Republicans and the Governor!!!!

 
 
Hey Hannity, when you continue
to smear Obama with Rezko, rememember that the rest
of America knows that Rezko is about the governor and Republicans; not Obama.
 
"With Rezko's jury being selected, you might think Republicans would feel some excitement running down their legs, the way liberal pundits tingle with Obamamania, or the way teenage girls respond to photographs of Justin Timberlake. Instead the Republicans are subdued. As I've warned before, the Rezko trial isn't about Obama. It is about Rezko and some Democrats, like Gov. Rod "The Unreformer" Blagojevich. But it also involves Rezko and powerful Illinois Republicans with national reach."
 
http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/local/chi-kass-rezko-trial-blago-column,1,4819064.column

 
 
Tags: Politics  
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Let's Explode This Myth That Black Men Have Had An Easier Time To The Top Than White Women

 
This myth advanced by Bill and Hillary Clinton and Gloria Steinem,
that black men have an easier time rising to the top than white women,
is pure garbage.
 
Here are the facts:
 
(1). Most corporations have a zero tolerance for sex discrimination, but no such zero-tolerance policy for race discrimination.

In other words, one can be summarily dismissed for sex discrimination, but race discriminators can survive for years, in corporations.For example, racist Mark Furhman is not only surviving, but is a hero on TV news and entertainment shows.

(2). Sex discrimination is a crime; race discrimination is not a crime.
 
(3). White women were always citizens from the inception of the nation; whereas Roger B. Taney, Supreme Court Chief Justice said that blacks were not citizens; could never be citizens; and were not intended to be citizens.

It took blacks another hundred years to become second class citizens; and another hundred years to approach full citizenship.

(4). Black men were slaves; white women were not.

(5). Black men had to pay poll taxes; white women never had to.

(6). White women lived in plantation mansions; while black men slaved in the fields, of those plantation mansions.

(7). Black men slaved for white men and white women; white women never slaved for black men.

(8). There have been more white women governors than black men governors.

(9). There have been more white women US Senators than black men US Senators.

(10). White Madeline Albright was Secretary of State before black Colin Powell.

(11). White women have been heads of Hollywood studios; no black man has ever been head of a Hollywood studio.

(12). Unqualified white Sally Ride went into space ahead of better qualified black pilots; three of whom had Ph. Ds.

So this outrageous notion that black men have had an easier time to the top than white women is pure fiction; and shows another cynical ploy by the Clintons to divide this nation.

Black people adored Bill Clinton and loved Hillary Clinton; until they played the race card in New Hampshire.

Before Iowa, black people were for Senator Clinton 60%-40%.

When the Clintons went into the bunker as was reported, after Iowa and hatched their version of the Southern Strategy, did blacks turn to Obama.

So don't give us this crap that we are voting for Obama because he is black.

We are voting for Obama because he is better qualified to be President on day one, period!!!

 
 
Tags: Politics  
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Clintons Say That The Media Is Against Her-Let's Test That In Real Time

 
 
(1).  Saturday Night Live Obama-Clinton skit; I didn't see it
but everyone including Senator Clinton said that it was
a skit in her favor.
 
(2). This morning, 3/1/2008-C-SPAN ran a Clinton campaign
event; and will re-air it at 9PM EST.  That's twice in prime time.
 
C-SPAN will run Obama's rally at 8PM EST; and has made no announcement
about re-air; so Clinton's rallies in this instance will run in prime
twice as many times as Obama's.
 
(3). In the mean time on Tim Russert's MSNBC show
at 4PM, MST, he had guests, Clinton supporter Dee Dee Myers,
AP's Ron Fournier, and Mary Matlin, married to a Clinton Supporter.
 
So on a program that airs three or four times all day during Saturday,
in prime time, 3/1/2008, Russert's, you have in effect, 2 or more Clinton supporters,
and no Obama supporters.
 
This amounts to free blanket coverage on MSNBC all day long
for Hillary Clinton.
****
 
I want to be fair here; C-SPAN in the past has run black events
many times when no other netwrok would; and I truly commend them.
 
And. MSNBC has at least two hosts who have been extremely fair; Olberman
is always right on the money and Chuck Todd nails the numbers before any one else does.
***
 
All I'm saying is that in this instance, going down to the wire; Clinton is getting
more favorable treatment than Obama.
 
 
 
 
 
 
Tags: Politics  
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Hey Dee Dee Myers-Ask Senator Clinton To Release Her Tax Returns.

 
 
Dee Dee, while you are out on the Tim Russert show,
advocating for her, why don't you ask Senator Clinton
to release her rax returns?
Tags: Politics  
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Hey Wolf Blitzer-Ask Senator Clinton to Release Her Tax Returns

 
 
What's wrong Mr. Blitzer, why don't you ask Senator Clinton
to release her tax returns?
Tags: Politics  
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Hannity-Call For Senator Clinton To Release Her Tax Returns

 
 
Hey Hannity, while you are at your hit job against Obama,
ask senator Clinton to release her tax returns.
Tags: Politics  
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Hey Hannity-Obama Locks Down Nuclear Weapons!!!

 
Hey Hanitty, when you do your hit job on Obama
tomorrow on your Fox News "Hanitty's America,"
Americans will already know that Obama has locked
down nuclear weapons; has reached across the aisle;
and is fighting terrorist; while you and Senator Clinton
are out making up lies about Obama:
 

Lugar-Obama Bill to Keep Weapons Out of Terrorists' Hands Heads to Senate Floor

Tuesday, May 23, 2006

Obama Contact: Robert Gibbs or Tommy Vietor, (202) 228-5511
Lugar Contact: Andy Fisher, andy_fisher@foreign.senate.gov, (202) 224-2079
Date: May 23, 2006

Lugar-Obama Bill to Keep Weapons Out of Terrorists' Hands Heads to Senate Floor

Bipartisan Effort Focuses on Antiaircraft Missiles, Stolen WMDs and Conventional Weapons used in Improvised Roadside Bombs

WASHINGTON - The U.S. Senate Foreign Relations Committee today passed out of committee, S. 2566, the Lugar-Obama Act. Modeled after the Nunn-Lugar program that focuses on weapons of mass destruction in the former Soviet Union, the bill was introduced by Sens. Dick Lugar (R-IN) and Barack Obama (D-IL) to expand the cooperative threat reduction concept to conventional weapons.

Lugar-Obama would expand the detection and interdiction of weapons and materials of mass destruction.

A full list of the legislation, nominations and treaties passed out of committee and headed to the Senate floor is available at: http://lugar.senate.gov/pressapp/record.cfm?id=255996.

"The proliferation of weapons of mass destruction is the number one national security threat that confronts the United States today. Under Senator Lugar's leadership, the Nunn-Lugar program has safely disposed of literally thousands of weapons of mass destruction which, had they fallen into the wrong hands, could have been used against America with catastrophic results. The Lugar-Obama bill will build on this success by helping other nations find and eliminate conventional weapons that have been used against our own soldiers in Iraq and sought by terrorists all over the world," said Obama
 
http://obama.senate.gov/press/060523-lugar-obama_bil/print.php
 
 
Tags: Politics  
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Hey Hannity-Obama Tells Americans Where Their Money Is Being Spent!!!

 

Obama, Coburn Introduce Bill Requiring Public Disclosure of All Recipients of Federal Funding

Friday, April 7, 2006

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
Washington Contact: Robert Gibbs or Tommy Vietor, (202) 228-5511
Illinois Contact: Julian Green (312) 886-3506
Date: April 7, 2006

Obama, Coburn Introduce Bill Requiring Public Disclosure of All Recipients of Federal Funding
Taxpayers Can Find Out Online How Their Money Is Spent

WASHINGTON - U.S. Senators Barack Obama (D-IL) and Tom Coburn, M.D. (R-OK) today announced the introduction of legislation that would publicly disclose all recipients of federal funding and financial assistance. The Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act (S. 2590) will allow taxpayers to see how their money is being spent, the Senators said.

The federal government awards roughly $300 billion in grants annually to 30,000 different organizations across the United States, according to the General Services Administration. This bill would require the Office of Management and Budget to establish and maintain a single public Web site that lists all entities receiving federal funds, including the name of each entity, the amount of federal funds the entity has received annually by program, and the location of the entity. All federal assistance must be posted within 30 days of such funding being awarded to an organization.

"At the very least, taxpayers deserve to know where their money is being spent," Senator Obama said. "This common-sense legislation would shine a bright light on all federal spending to help prevent tax dollars from being wasted. If government spending can't withstand public scrutiny, then the money shouldn't be spent."
http://obama.senate.gov/press/060407-coburn_introduc/print.php
 
Tags: Politics  
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Hey Hannity-Are You Going To Report On The Radical Ties Of The Clintons Too?

 
 

Clinton Camp Pushes O-Bomber Links: Ignores Her Own Radical Ties

Clinton, Obama Spar on Ties to Radicals

By JUSTIN ROOD

Feb. 22, 2008—

 

The Hillary Clinton campaign pushed to reporters today stories about Barack Obama and his ties to former members of a radical domestic terrorist group -- but did not note that as president, Clinton's husband pardoned more than a dozen convicted violent radicals, including a member of the same group mentioned in the Obama stories.

"Wonder what the Republicans will do with this issue," mused Clinton spokesman Phil Singer in one e-mail to the media, containing a New York Sun article reporting a $200 contribution from William Ayers, a founding member of the Weather Underground, to Obama in 2001. (Obama's ties to the radical group first surfaced last week in a Bloomberg News article.)

In a separate e-mail, Singer forwarded an article from Politico.com reporting on a 1995 event at a private home that brought Obama together with Ayers and Bernardine Dohrn, another former member of the radical group.

Opting to leave any attacks on the issue to the GOP may be wise, as attacks from Clinton could backfire. In his final day in office, President Clinton pardoned another one-time member of the Weather Underground, Susan L. Rosenberg, after she had served 16 years in prison on federal charges.

Rosenberg had been arrested in 1984 while unloading 740 pounds of dynamite, a submachine gun and other weapons from the back of a car.

Rosenberg admitted the materials were to supply others for politically-motivated attacks. Authorities had been searching for Rosenberg since 1981, for what they believed was her role in the robbery of a Brinks truck in Rockland County, N.Y. The attack, for which Rosenberg was thought to have aided with surveillance and getaway driving, left two police officers and a guard dead.

Rosenberg has denied playing a role in the Brinks heist. In arguing for a pardon in 2001, she noted that she had been a model prisoner.

And in 1999, President Clinton also pardoned 16 violent Puerto Rican nationalists responsible for more than 100 bombings of U.S. political and military installations, after they promised to renounce violence. The attacks reportedly killed six people and wounded dozens more. In justifying the pardons, President Clinton noted none of the men had been convicted of crimes that resulted in death or injuries.

At the time, the first lady said she opposed her husband's decision to free the men, who had by then each served more than 19 years in prison for crimes including armed robbery and illegal weapons possession. The reason, a spokesman said then, was that the men had taken too long -- more than three weeks -- to agree to renounce any future violent activity.

Contacted by phone Friday morning, spokesman Singer declined to comment for the record for this article.

"If the Clinton campaign is truly concerned about the exploitation of the Weather Underground issue by the Republican attack machine, perhaps they should focus on the pardon of some of its members in the waning days of the Clinton administration," Obama spokesman Bill Burton said.

Ayers and Dohrn disappeared after a bomb, meant to be detonated at New Jersey military barracks, prematurely exploded in a Manhattan townhouse. It was expected to have been one of more than two dozen bombings by the group. The two turned themselves in to authorities in 1980. Neither served jail time for the attacks to which they were believed to be linked.

Richard Esposito contributed to this report.
 
http://abcnews.go.com/Blotter/story?id=4330128&page=1
Tags: Politics  
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Senator Clinton Plays The Victim Card Again!!!

 
 
   

Jake Tapper is ABC News' Senior National Correspondent based in the network's Washington bureau. He writes about politics and popular culture and covers a range of national stories.

Clinton: Playing Field for Her as Candidate Not Even Because of Her Gender

February 28, 2008 8:44 PM

In an interview with ABC News' Cynthia McFadden to air on this evening's "Nightline," Sen. Hillary Clinton, D-N.Y., says it's tougher for her to run as a woman than it is for her male opponent.

Asked why she thinks so many women may be feeling sorry for her, Clinton said, "I think a lot of women project their own feelings and their lives onto me, and they see how hard this is.  It's hard.  It's hard being a woman out there.  It is obviously challenging with some of the things that are said that are not even personal to me so much as they are about women.

"And I think women just sort of shake their head," Clinton continued. "My friends do.  They say, 'Oh, my gosh, this is so hard.' Well, it's supposed to be hard.  I'm running for the hardest job in the world.  No one has ever done this.  No woman has ever won a presidential primary before I won New Hampshire.  This is hard. And I don't expect any sympathy, I don't expect any kind of, you know, allowances or special privileges, because I knew what I was getting myself into.

"Every so often I just wish that it were a little more of an even playing field," she said, "but, you know, I play on whatever field is out there."

Of course, it might be observed that it likely hasn't exactly been a complete walk in the park for an African-American to run for president, either.

But apparently Clinton thinks -- based on this comment -- that the "playing field" is easier for a black man than a white woman.

I also wonder if former Sen. John Edwards, D-N.C. -- and all the other men vanquished by Clinton (and Obama) so handily -- think that they had an easy go of it.

What do you think?

- jpt

Black Knight  Comments:

Senator Clinton as well as Bill Clinton as well as Gloria Steinem, who share the lying belief that black men have had an easier way to the top than white women, are just plain liars:

(1). Most corporations have a zero tolerance for sex discrimination, but no such zero-tolerance policy for race discrimination.

In other words, one can be summarily dismissed for sex discrimination, but race discriminators can survive for years, in corporations.

For example, racist Mark Furhman is not only surviving, but is a hero on TV news and entertainment shows.

(2). Sex discrimination is a crime; race discrimination is not a crime.

(3). White women were always citizens from the inception of the nation; whereas Roger B. Taney, Supreme Court Justice said that blacks were not citizens; could never be citizens; and were not intended to be citizens.

It took blacks another hundred years to become second class citizens; and another hundred years to approach full citizenship.

(4). Black men were slaves; white women were not.

(5). Black men had to pay poll taxes; white women never had to.

(6). White women lived in plantation mansions; while black men slaved in the fields, of those plantation mansions.

(7). Black men slaved for white men and white women; white women never slaved for black men.

(8). There have been more white women governors than black men governors.

(9). There have been more white women US Senators than black men US Senators.

(10). White Madeline Albright was Secretary of State before black Colin Powell.

(11). White women have been heads of Hollywood studios; no black man has ever been head of a Hollywood studio.

(12). Unqualified white Sally Ride went into space ahead of better qualified black pilots; three of whom had Ph. Ds.

So this outrageous notion that black men have had an easier time to the top than white women is pure fiction; and shows another cynical ploy by the Clintons to divide this nation.

Black people adored Bill Clinton and loved Hillary Clinton; until they played the race card in New Hampshire.

Before Iowa, black people were for Senator Clinton 60%-40%.

When the Clintons went into the bunker as was reported, after Iowa and hatched their version of the Southern Strategy, did blacks turn to Obama.

So don't give us this crap that we are voting for Obama because he is black.

We are voting for Obama because he is better qualified to be President on day one, period!!!

 
 
http://blogs.abcnews.com/politicalpunch/2008/02/clinton-playing.html
Tags: Politics  
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Hannity-Will You Repudiate Buckley For This?

 
 
Also in 1957, Buckley came out strongly in support of the segregationist South, writing "The central question that emerges…is whether the White community in the South is entitled to take such measures as are necessary to prevail, politically and culturally, in areas where it does not predominate numerically? The sobering answer is Yes—the White community is so entitled because, for the time being, it is the advanced race.” in the August 24, 1957 edition of the National Review.
 
Buckley gave aid and comfort to racist, bigots and segregationist.
 
Will you repudiate him for that?
 
 
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/William_F._Buckley,_Jr.
Tags: Politics  
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Hannity_Will You Repudiate Kingston For Not Repudiating Maddox?

 
 
Hannity, since you want Obama to condemn Farrakhan,
will you condemn (R) Georgia Jack Kingston for not repudiating
racist Georgia Governor Lester Maddox?
 
Maddox gained famed for pulling a gun on black people to
deny them entry to his restaraunt.
 
 
 
 
 
Tags: Politics  
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Obama-Red Alert-Senator Clinton Is Going To Appalachia To Start Crying Again To Win The Women's Vote

 
 
Senator Clinton is going to Appalachia to gain sympathy.
 
You have to counter.
 
Get Michelle on the TV.
 
I don't care what the news media says, Michelle is pure genius.
 
Every time Clinton does theatrics, counter with Michelle
or other well spoken women in your campaign.
Tags: Politics  
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Obama-Call John Madden And Ask Him What Prevent Defenses Do

 
 
Prevent defenses prevent nothing.
 
Be courteous to Senator Clinton, but get back on the
offensive.
 
Close the deal.  Run through the tape.
 
You are taking your foot off the pedal.  Don't do that.
 
Full offensive ahead.
Tags: Politics  
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Obama-Here Is The Answer To The Farrakhan Question

 
 
Cokie Roberts was born Mary Martha Corinne Morrison Claiborne Boggs, the daughter of Hale Boggs,
one of the chief racist in Congress and a signer of The Southern Manifesto against Brown v Board of Education
which integrated the schools.
 
Ms. Roberts is a chief supporter of Hillary Clinton as can be seen by her
comments last week on "Round Table" on ABC's "This Week."
 
http://abcnews.go.com/Video/playerIndex?id=4336192
 
Where Cokie called Obama a "cute young man saying sweet nothings," and
"He has not reached across the aisle to get things done, whereas she (Clinton)
has."
 
This completely over looks the fact that Obama has worked with
Senator Lugar on locking down weapons of mass destruction.
 
The point is, Cokie Roberts comes from a viciously racist family,
supports Clinton; comes into our living rooms every week
to belittle Obama; yet nobody asks Senator Clinton why the daughter
of a racist is allowed to advocate for Clinton.
 
The question is why is Farrakhan presumed to cast a shadow over
Obama, while Cokie Robert's father is not presumed to cast a shadow
over Clinton?
 
I would answer the Farrakhan question this way, "when you, (interviewer),
look into the racist background of every Clinton supporter and question her on
those, then it would be fair to question me on Farrakan; otherwise you
are not conducting a fair interview."
 
 
Tags: Politics  
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive