About Me

Name:Black Knight
Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Blog Roll

 

Obama-Why do You Call Senator Clinton a Friend?- She Never Calls You a Friend

Posted by Black Knight on Tuesday, March 04, 2008 10:52:19 PM
 
 
Senator Clinton calls McCain a friend.
 
She calls John Lewis a friend.
 
But she never calls you a friend.
 
So, why do you continue to call her a friend.
 
Can't you see that the woman hates your guts and despises the ground you walk on?
 
She even puts the Republican McCain over you.
 
She says her and McCain have experience and all you have is speech.
 
That's the greatest insult in political history.
 
Candidates say insulting things about one another, but never has a candidate reached to the other party to compliment that party's candidate over one from their own party.
 
What's it going to take before you realize that this lady has played the okeydoke on you, and hates your guts.
 
Unleash Michelle.  Michelle can take her on with one hand tied behind her back.
 
 
Tags: Politics  
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

The Clintons Swim in the Gutter Again, And Play The Race Card

Posted by Black Knight on Tuesday, March 04, 2008 10:28:29 PM
 
The Clintons darken Obama photo; emphasizing Obama's darkness.  Same old Clintons playing the race card..
by FOXNews.com
Tuesday, March 4, 2008
Border
comment

A controversial new Hillary Clinton attack ad caused an Internet stir Tuesday among critics who claim it deliberately darkens Barack Obama’s skin color.

The buzz began earlier the day, when the liberal Web site DailyKos.com showed side-by-side screen grabs of Barack Obama taken during a debate with Clinton in Cleveland last week. The screen grab used in the ad showed a clearly darker-skinned Obama, prompting some to wonder if it was done to highlight his race.

Clinton spokesman Jay Carson responded initially by speculating the darkened image might have occurred as part of a normal “saturation-desaturation” process typical in commercial production. He said both Obama and Clinton have used that process in their ads, and denied any ulterior motive behind the campaign’s ad.

After checking with ad guru Mandy Grunwald, however, Carson later said the images on the DailyKos site were not taken from the Clinton ad at all. “We don’t know what is up there, but it is not our ad,” he insisted.

There is no way to independently confirm the accuracy of the images on DailyKos.com. But debate images of Obama taken by FOXNews.com directly from the ad in question on Clinton’s official Web site still seem to be clearly darker than images of Obama taken from another video clip from the debate.

Tags: Politics  
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (2) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Obama-If Clinton Wins By 1/2 of a Vote-Expect An Avalanche Of Publicity That Could Bury You

Posted by Black Knight on Tuesday, March 04, 2008 7:46:35 AM
 
 
Expect publicity so great that it will bury you for months from which you may not recover.
 
But recover you can.
 
First thing, don't let Axelrod near a TV talk show.  He can't express himself.  Wolfson buried him alive last week on This Week.
 
Your campaign manager needs to shut up; the one who says "Hillary will fail."  He's going to make your campaign look foolish if she wins.
 
He keeps giving her ammunition to win; "she can't win; she will fail;" which makes her more determined. Makes me think he works for the Clintons.  No sports team ever gives an opponent this much incentive to win; by saying "they can't win."  Any coach who said that on the eve of a game would be fired immediately.  It's just not done; and your campaign manager has done it three times.  I've never seen anything as counter productive in my life.
 
Finally, you keep giving her life lines with these debates.
 
You had her down and out, but you agreed to debates which revived her campaign.
 
This shooting yourself in the foot has got to stop.
 
The same news that would not declare you the victor after Super Tuesday will play up her victories like nothing you've never seen.
Tags: Politics  
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Obama-Here Is My Suggested Line-up For Sunday Morning Talk Shows

Posted by Black Knight on Monday, March 03, 2008 11:51:40 PM
 
 
I would have the following core of quick responders for the Sunday Morning Talk shows; ready to go on when the networks call.
 
These are the ones I have heard.  No one else in your campaign should feel slighted.
 
These are just the ones I've heard and who are excellent spokes people.
 
Michelle
 
Ted Kennedy
 
Chis Dodd
 
Claire McCaskill
 
John Kerry
 
Deval Patrick
 
Susan Rice
 
Janet Napolitano
 
Dick Durbin
 
Tom Daschle
 
These people are all outstanding and present an expert face to your campaign.
 
Don't just let anybody speak on your behalf; like that guy from Texas; made you look bad.
 
Tags: Politics  
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Obama-The Next Thing I Would Do-Is This

Posted by Black Knight on Monday, March 03, 2008 11:09:10 PM
 
 
That so-called plagiarism video the Clintons put out on you is still playing on YouTube.
 
I'd put one out on her showing how she stole the "If we can track those from Blockbuster, we can track illegals" line from John Edwards.
 
Americans will understand that you are not playing gutter politics but defending yourself.
 
If you continue to leave that Youtube unanswered, then you give the people who may vote for you a reason not to vote for you.  At least with a counter Youtube, the undecided can say "How can Clinton be so low to bring this out, when she is even more guilty."
 
Next, I'd put on the net, Clinton dressed in a foreign costume.  At least you'll have something out there to counter the Kenya outfit that you have on.
 
Don't let that stuff remain out there unanswered.
 
Clinton is going after the heart of your campaign; the young people and the internet to cast doubt on your integrity.
 
Next time she wants to debate, condition it on her releasing her tax returns and the financial Clinton Library documents immediately; and let her know she does not set your agenda.  You let her get away with entirely too much!!!
 
You don't have to exaggerate her words on flyers, like that NAFTA thing.  Quote her exactly; don't rely on sloppy newspaper accounts.  Do it precisely or don't do it at all.  Don't give her an excuse to challenge what you say.  You know how she is.  She'll take any millimeter of hole and drive a truck through it.
Tags: Politics  
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Obama-Here is My Suggestion To Fight Back!!!

Posted by Black Knight on Monday, March 03, 2008 10:41:59 PM
 
 
Americans like a fighter; as long as you fight fair.
 
I would announce to the American people the following:
 
"As you know I have been subjected to the gutter politics from my opponent,  the race card, the crying card to get women's sympathy, the gender card, the Muslim card and the fear card, all gutter, lowest common denominator politics.
 
Jack Kennedy appealed to the highest common denominator, and I too will maitain those standards; but will  fight back.
 
Today, I am going to announce a "No First Strike Policy," which means, I will not be the first to use gutter politics, but no gutter politic will go unaswered.
 
I reserve the right to defend myself against these vicious attacks.
 
Those of you who have failed to go after the Clintons for dirty politics, who have carried the Clinton's water, don't come knocking on my door when I respond.
 
I'm announcing right now the Melvin Laird "2X" policy.  If they hit me, I'm going to hit them twice as hard.
 
Americans will understand that I am not going to be a doormat for the Clintons while they sling this swamp water at my campaign.
 
Thank you and good night.
 
 
Tags: Politics  
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Obama-What Do We Know about The Clintons?

Posted by Black Knight on Monday, March 03, 2008 10:27:36 PM
 
 
This describes the Clintons:
 
They are desparate and will do and say anything to win.
 
They will save their dirtiest tricks until the last day before the primaries.
 
They have access to TV, Saturday Night Live, 60 Minutes, the Daley Show that you do not have access to.
 
Their surrogates and John McCain's surrogates have access to ABC's This Week, Tim Russert, Wolf Blitzer, etc that you do not have access to.
 
People like George Stephanopolous, Joe Scarborough, Alex Witt are walking advertisements for the Clinton campaign; no major TV commentator or host is a walking advertisement for your campaign.
 
TV News host always ask experts what  Clinton can do to beat you, but they never ask the experts what you can do to continue to beat Clinton.  Sports commentators always ask the experts what are the keys to success for both teams A & B; so as not to show bias towards one team or another.  You get no such consideration from News commentators.
 
The Clintons will play the race card in order to win.
 
Clinton will cry inorder to win.
 
Clinton will lie about and distort your record in order to win.
 
The networks are complicit with the Clintons inorder to help her to win; for example, they have played the last Saturday Night Live Clinton appearance over and over again; giving her hours of free face time; without rebuttal or cross examination from you.
 
They also played Clinton's crying spell in New Hampshire 24 straight hours thus gaining the women's sympathy vote.
 
They will play the gender card in order to win.
 
No gutter politics is too low for them to wallow in.
 
They will play the Muslim card.
 
They will play the fear card.
 
You are at a tremendous disadvantage.
 
What can you do to fight back?
 
I'll be the expert and suggest.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Tags: Politics  
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Canada Backs Obama On NAFTA-No Back door Deal!!!

Posted by Black Knight on Monday, March 03, 2008 9:59:09 PM
 
 
UPDATE 1-Canada defends Obama over NAFTA flap
03.03.08, 7:00 PM ET

 
(Adds comments from candidates, embassy statement)

By David Ljunggren

OTTAWA(Reuters) - Canada defended Democratic front-runner Barack Obama Monday over accusations from rival Hillary Clinton that he is secretly at ease with a hemispheric trade accord which he publicly blames for losing U.S. jobs.

Clinton's criticism, on the eve of make-or-break presidential nomination contests for her in Ohio and Texas, stemmed from a report by Canadian television station CTV that an Obama economic adviser told Canadian officials the candidate was not seriously considering disrupting the trade accord.

But the Canadian Embassy in Washington released a statement essentially backing up the Obama camp's version of the meeting between adviser Austan Goolsbee and officials at the Canadian consulate in Chicago.

"There was no intention to convey, in any way, that Senator Obama and his campaign team were taking a different position in public from views expressed in private, including about NAFTA," the embassy statement said. "We deeply regret any inference that may have been drawn to that effect."

The consulate's written report of the meeting had left the suggestion that Obama's words on NAFTA were designed for a political audience and should not be taken too seriously, prompting an angry denial from the Obama campaign.

Clinton, a New York senator, has made an issue of what she says is Obama's support for the North American Free Trade Agreement, which her husband, former President Bill Clinton, signed in 1994 but which is now under heavy election-year criticism from her and Obama.

On Monday, Clinton challenged Obama's credibility on the trade issue ahead of the nomination contest in Ohio, where concern over the NAFTA trade agreement has become a key issue.

"It raises questions about Senator Obama coming to Ohio and giving speeches about NAFTA and having his chief economic adviser tell the Canadian government that it was just political rhetoric," she said at an early morning news conference in Ohio.

Both candidates fighting for the Democratic nomination to face the Republicans' choice in the November election have threatened to pull the United States out of NAFTA unless it is renegotiated.

They said the accord has hurt the manufacturing base in such states as economically hard-hit Ohio, which along with Texas votes on Tuesday.

 

CANADA PM DENIES INTERFERENCE

Some U.S. Democrats accused Canada's right-leaning Conservative government of trying to interfere in the U.S. presidential election.

That charge led Canadian Prime Minister Stephen Harper to take the unusual step of denying that Canada was trying to stir up trouble in the election process of its powerful southern neighbor.

"I certainly deny any allegation that this government has attempted to interfere in the American election," he told the country's parliament.

"The American people will make the decision as to their next president and I am confident that whoever that person is ... (they) will continue the strong alliance, friendship and partnership that we enjoy with the United States."

Canada sends 75 percent of its exports to the United States and would be badly hurt if Washington pulled out of NAFTA.

The U.S. Economic Policy Institute, a pro-labor think tank, has blamed NAFTA for more than 1 million U.S. job losses, most of them in manufacturing, since 1994. However, others put the tally much lower than that.

Obama, an Illinois senator, acknowledged that a meeting did take place between Goolsbee and the Canadian consulate officials but added, "He said exactly what I've been saying on the campaign trail."

In San Antonio, Texas, Obama said, "This notion that Senator Clinton is peddling that somehow there's contradictions or winks and nods has been disputed by all parties involved." (Additional reporting by Caren Bohan and Ellen Wulfhorst; Writing by Steve Holland; Editing by Stuart Grudgings)

Copyright 2008 Reuters
 
http://www.forbes.com/reuters/feeds/reuters/2008/03/03/2008-03-04T000047Z_01_N03391783_RTRIDST_0_CANADA-OBAMA-UPDATE-1.html
Tags: Politics  
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

America-Don't Fall For The Clinton Wolfson Tax Return Okeydoke!!!

Posted by Black Knight on Sunday, March 02, 2008 8:43:24 PM
 
 
Clinton is supposed to release her tax returns on April 15th?
 
What kind of garbage is this?
 
The 2006 returns were done last year and should be released immediately.
 
There is no need to wait until April 15th.
 
Media should demand the release of the returns now.!!!
 
What are the Clintons hiding?
Tags: Politics  
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Mock Interview With The Rev Doctor Jeremiah Wright

Posted by Black Knight on Sunday, March 02, 2008 4:45:46 PM
 
 
BK:  Good Afternoon Dr. Wright.  We hope all is well and that your family is well.
 
JAW: Good Afternoon.  I'm well and my family is well.  Thank you for inquiring.
 
BK: Is it true that you were a Marine?
 
JAW: Yes.
 
BK: Is it also true that you transferred out of the Marine Corps into the Navy as a cardiopulmonary technician?
 
JAW: Yes.
 
BK: You mean to tell me that you were both a Marine and a Navy Corpsman?
 
JAW: Yes.
 
BK: Well, that's astounding.  Nobody can question your patrotism.
 
JAW: Well the right wing tries.  But you know how they are.  They'll twist anything to fit their ideology.
 
BK: Is it true you have a BS and a Masters Degree from Howard University?
 
JAW: Yes.
 
BK: Is it true that you received a second Masters Degree for the University of Chicago Divinity School?
 
JAW: Yes.
 
BK: Isn't the University of Chicago the same school that produced distiguished alums such as:  John Ashcroft, Supreme Sourt Justice Antonin Scalia, Paul Wolfowitz, Nobel-Economist Milton Friedman, Nobel-novelist T.S. Elliot, and Nobel-physicist Enrico Fermi, among many other famous Americans?
 
JAW:  Yes.
 
BK:  All bedrock, rock-ribbed Americans, right.
 
JAW: Right.  Elliot was born in America and moved to the UK and Fermi became a US Citizen in 1944; but all Americans still. Yes.
 
BK: Is the University of Chicago some kind of out of the mainstream radical university?
 
JAW: No, it is one of the finest most conservative universities in the nation and world; producing 81  Nobel Laureates. 
 
BK:  So any notion that you are anti-American or anti-white is... how would you describe it?
 
JAW: Pure foolishness.  We have white people in our choir and in our congregation.  We are unashamedly Afro-Centric, not because we hate America; we don't have time for that kind of destructive foolishness.  We are Afro-Centric because we owe a special debt to Africa and their customs which is not inconsistent with others who value their ties to the  Middle East.  America has nothing to fear from us.
 
BK: Is it true that you received a Doctorate from United Theological Seminary under Dr. Samuel DeWitt Proctor?
 
JAW:  Yes.
 
BK: Is the UTS associated with Al Qaeda?
 
JAW: No.
 
BK: Is UTS associated with Bin Laden?
 
JAW: No.
 
BK: Is UTS associated with the communist party?
 
JAW: No.
 
BK: Is UTS anti-American?
 
JAW: No.
 
BK: Is UTS anti-white?
 
JAW: No.
 
BK: Do you know this Ayers from the Weather Undergorund?
 
JAW: I know of him, yes.
 
BK: Hannity is spreading the implication that Obama sought him out and that Ayers contributed to Obama's campaign.
 
JAW: That implication is a flat out lie.  Obama didn't seek out Ayers.  Obama was brought to Ayers home by Obama's predecessor and Ayers contributed the grand sum od $200 to Obama's campaign.
 
BK: Just a measly $200?
 
JAW: Yes.
 
BK: Then why is Hannity smearing Obama with this garbage?
 
JAW: Hannity is a fear-mongerer who is trying to drive the electorate away from Obama.
 
BK: Do you believe America will let Hannity get away with it?
 
JAW: I have faith in the American people; and even if Hannity is successful, the American people don't like ugly, and will deal with him in the ratings accordingly.
 
BK: Does Michelle Obama's Princeton Thesis bother you, when she says even in liberal Princeton, she still felt isolated?
 
JAW: No.  David Robinson who went to the Naval Academy said the same thing.  He said that sitting around talking with his white associates, everything was alright; but as soon as it was time to go a social gathering which may have including inter-racial dancing; then he was shunned.
 
She was writing about a true experience, and for Hannity or anyone else to try and turn it into something it isn't; that in itself is a tragedy.
 
BK: Have you ever recommended that anyone fly a plane into the World Trade Center?
 
JAW: No.
 
BK: Have you ever burned a cross in someone elses yard?
 
JAW: No, but others have done it to us.
 
BK: Have you ever blown up four little girls in a church?
 
JAW: No, but others have done it to us.
 
BK:  Then why do you believe that some people like Hannity continue to treat us like the scum of the earth?
 
JAW: They are small fear-mongering people who do not believe in modernity and progress.  They believe that they should hog everything; that they alone are entitled; and not share with especially black people; even though we've do nothing but ask for an even shake in America.
 
BK: Why did you give an award to Farrakhan?
 
JAW:  Let's get this straight.  I have told Minister Farrkhan to his face that antisemitic language and attitudes are unacceptable in America.  I have renounced him over his antisemitism; and if you lived in Chicago, you would know that.  Let's get that out of the way first.
 
I gave him the award for the positives after the Million Man March.  I thought he did a good thing; and I might add, Bill Clinton gave a lenient leave policy to Federal Workers during that time, so that they could attend or watch the March.  I know that to be a fact because I have many friends in the government who attended or watched.
 
Secondly, Farrakhan is Farrakhan.  He is not Jerimiah Wright and he is certainly not Obama.
 
Thirdly, will you now go and ask Senator Clinton to renounce Cokie Roberts whose father was the notorious racist Hale Boggs?
 
Will you now go and tell McCain to renounce Hagee a notorious anti-Catholic bigot?
 
How far do you want to take this nonsense?
 
BK:  I think you have answered all of our questions. Thank you for your time.
 
JAW: Thank you.  Happy to do it.  God Bless America.
 
 
 
 
 
 
Tags: Politics  
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Hey Hannity-Make McCain Denounce Hagee

Posted by Black Knight on Sunday, March 02, 2008 3:46:21 PM

Hagee Endorsement for McCain Comes Under Fire

February 29, 2008 11:19 AM

Calling Pastor John Hagee a "bigot," the conservative Catholic League is calling for Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., to denounce/renounce/reject his endorsement Wednesday.

With a Youtube link to prove his point, Catholic League president Bill Donohue said Hagee "has waged an unrelenting war against the Catholic Church. For example, he likes calling it ‘The Great Whore,’ an ‘apostate church,’ the ‘anti-Christ,’ and a ‘false cult system.’ ...“Senator Obama has repudiated the endorsement of Louis Farrakhan, another bigot. McCain should follow suit and retract his embrace of Hagee.”
http://blogs.abcnews.com/politicalpunch/2008/02/hagee-endorseme.html
Tags: Poltics  
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (2) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Russert's Meet The Press Has Four Guests- All Represent Clinton With No One Representing Obama

Posted by Black Knight on Sunday, March 02, 2008 3:30:01 PM
 
James Carville worked for Bill Clinton.  Mary Matlin is married to Carville.  Mike Murphy worked for John McCain.  Bob Shrum
is from the DLC and has been shown on other programs, is for Senator Clinton and no friend of Obama's.
 
So what you have here is 4-1 in favor of Clinton.

MR. RUSSERT:  With us, he helped put Bill and Hillary Clinton in the White House in 1992:  Democrat James Carville.  She worked for Bush 41, Bush 43 and Dick Cheney:  Republican Mary Matalin.  He worked for John McCain on his 2000 presidential campaign:  Republican Mike Murphy.  And he worked for Kerry, Gore and Barack Obama's key supporter Ted Kennedy:  Democrat Bob Shrum.  The very latest polls, strategies and issues.  The race for the White House through the eyes of Carville, Matalin, Murphy and Shrum, only on MEET THE PRESS...
***
 
 
Now this next section shows how unfair this process is.  They always ask on MSNBC, CBS, ABC, CNN, FOX, "What can Hillary do to win?"
 
They never ask "What can Obama do to continue to win?"
 
This has been going on since Hillary lost Iowa, for three months favorable free advice from all the experts.
 
Sports commentators on ESPN are fair.  They ask "What are the keys to victory for both teams A and B?" so as not to show a bias towards one team or another.
 
If one takes the position that life is not fair, then don't lie and say that the media is against Clinton and for Obama.
***
 
MR. RUSSERT:  Mary Matalin, as a political strategist--take away your own political identity--what would you be saying to Hillary Clinton today after looking at those polls?
 
MS. MARY MATALIN:  That even if she wins barely--well, she loses, she's out. But one thing that we don't know for sure yet, and there's not been a pattern that's emerged through these primaries of who voted early and who did they vote for, and who's voting late and where are they going to break.  They've broken in different spots.  So say, if she loses both, that's one scenario. If she wins both, even fractionally, she says, "He can't close the deal. There's something, you have a lot of concerns about me.  I've run a terrible campaign.  I might not be the face of change that he is, but I've"--you know, go back to the message that worked, connect with people, quit talking about herself like, "Why do I always get the first question?" "Why do I always get the last question?" What, what--that's not about what they care about.  So go back to those things that work and say, "Why can't he close the deal?  He can't close the deal."
 
MR. MIKE MURPHY:  And she's got one thing working for her, which is the near-death experience phenomena this year.  Every time it looks like...
 
MR. BOB SHRUM:  That's right.

MR. MURPHY:  ..."Perils of Pauline," the train's coming, she has a rescue. And in their meeting, they have the simplest message of all:  "Guys, victory or death." So.

MR. SHRUM:  Right.

MR. CARVILLE:  And, and, and if--but if she does win both, it changes the narrative.

MR. SHRUM:  Well, if she wins...

MR. CARVILLE:  And wins big--if she wins both, it changes the narrative.

MR. BOB SHRUM:

MR. CARVILLE:  Then she has a real case, then she has a real sort of case to make that she's coming back.

MR. SHRUM:  She has a real...

MR. MURPHY:  She does.  She has...

MR. SHRUM:  She has a real case to make where the math is very much against her.

MR. MURPHY:  Right.

MR. CARVILLE:  Right.  That's right.  Right.

MR. SHRUM:  She has to go to Pennsylvania then, which is going to be a seven-week campaign, which is going to be amazing.  And she has to win by more than a point or two, not only because she can't catch up in the math, but because she's got to establish some kind of moral claim to the nomination.
***
 
And it goes on and on like that on every network every day.
***
 
I'm not whining about this.  We black people have accepted this as
standard operating procedure for years.
***
 
So we are not the ones who are complaining, but the Clintons are.
***
 
We just wanted to point that out to correct the record.
Tags: Politics  
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Face The Nation Apears Equal But Still Favors Clinton

Posted by Black Knight on Sunday, March 02, 2008 3:05:22 PM
 
I have great respect for Bob Scheiffer because in my opinion
he tends to be fair over the course of many years; so this is not a knock on him; but on the
producers, editors of the show.
 
Dodd and Bayh were excellent; and each represented
their candidate fairly.
 
Richardson was extremely evenhanded; and should be commended.
 
So how can an evenly produced show still favor Clinton?
 
Here's how:
 
The show led with Clinton's SNL skit which favors Clinton,
and ended with Richardson, though fair to both sides,
is still more closely associated with Clinton.
 
So a program which appears on the surface to be fair
favors Clinton in the set up of the show.
 
Notice that Obama is not complaining about this,
but on the otherhand, despite overwhelming evidence to
the contrary, Senator Clinton makes the false claim
that media favors Obama.
 
Tags: Politics  
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

MSNBC's Morning Show With Alex Witt Scores a One Hour Cheering Section For Senator Clinton

Posted by Black Knight on Sunday, March 02, 2008 2:48:01 PM
 
 
The first 9 minutes, from 7:00 AM to 7:09 AM, MST, of the MSNBC Sunday Morning Show
was a virtual cheering section for Senator Clinton.
 
At 7:16 AM-Ms. Witt mentioned Jack Nicholson film endorsing Clinton.
 
Twenty-one minutes into the show, she finally mentions Obama in any substative
way at 7:21AM.
 
At 7:36AM Witt sets up the Clinton SNL skit for review.
 
In the meanttime she runs a segment that links Obama to Al Quaeda;
a segment which says that Al Quada is against Obama, but the
visual nonetheless, still links Obama to Al Quaeda.
 
Then at 7:42AM Witt has a full discussion of the SNL
Clinton skit.
 
A virtual one hour hit against Obama in favor of Clinton.
 
Those who say that the media is against Senator Clinton
are out of their minds.
Tags: Politics  
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Saturday Night Live Scores A Triple Hit against Obama!!!

Posted by Black Knight on Sunday, March 02, 2008 1:50:31 PM
 
Saturday Night Live, 3/1/2008 showed Senator Clinton again in a favorable
light, including a continuation skit from last week proporting to
show favorable news treatment for Obama.
 
This was triple hit against Obama:
 
(1). Clinton had face time; Obama did not.
(2). The skit favored Clinton.
(3). SNL's Seth Myers showed again Obama in the Muslim outfit.
 
 
Tags: Politics  
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous12…2829303132333435363738Next »