About Me

Name:Black Knight
Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Blog Roll

 

Obama Wins Texas Delegate Race!!!

 
 
     Obama  Clinton
OH
    66     75
RI      8     13
VT      9      6
TX     99     94
WY
     7      5
 
 
http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2008/3/10/11748/6707
 
Tags: Politics  
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Commander In Chief Obama Beat Commander In Chief McCain In First Proxy Fight!!!

 
 

Obama's "bad" week Hotlist

Mon Mar 10, 2008 at 06:03:28 AM PDT

So CW is that last week was the "week from hell" for Obama, and given that he could've closed this thing out and didn't, we can stipulate that it could've been better.

But let's see just how horrible the week was:

Per Obama's count (if Clinton had a similar count, I'll happily link to it), Obama started last week with 1,203 delegates, Clinton with 1,043. Since then:

     Obama  Clinton
OH
    66     75
RI      8     13
VT      9      6
TX     99     94
WY
     7      5

Total 189    193

So that's a four-delegate gain for Clinton.

But that wasn't all. Obama also picked up three more super delegates last Tuesday -- Texas Democratic Party Vice Chair Roy Laverne Brooks, DNC member Mary Long of Georgia and South Carolina Democratic Party Chair Carol Fowler.

That pegs things at 192-193 for the week.

And then on Saturday, Obama provided material help in Bill Foster's dramatic upset victory in IL-14, filming an ad and sending hundreds of volunteers into the district. The Republicans had John McCain campaign for the Republican candidate, yet still lost proving that Obama 1) is more focused on party building and down-ballot races than the Clinton campaign (where was she?), 2) that he could out-battle McCain in the first proxy battle of the season, and 3) that he's got some serious coattails.Oh, and Bill Foster is now a super delegate and repaid Obama's largesse by promising him his vote.

So yes, Obama has some serious message issues to deal with and a shaken campaign to right. But where it matters -- in the delegate race -- Obama ended his week from hell TIED with Clinton.

Furthermore, there's an "unpledged" Wyoming delegate still to be decided. He or she will be selected at Wyoming's state convention, and is selected by the elected delegates from Saturday's caucus. In other words, it's going to be another Obama delegate. So unofficially, Obama actually won the delegate race last week.As Clinton gears up her efforts for coup by super delegate, threatening civil war within the party, it bears noting that in her best week of the campaign since her New Hampshire victory, she actually lost ground in the race.

Update: It was even better for Obama last week. The final certified vote in California swung four votes Obama's direction. So officially, Obama gained four delegates last week, unofficially (including that Wyoming unpledged delegate), it was five.Update II: And there were two new super delegate endorsements for Obama on Saturday -- NV State Party Vice Chairwoman Teresa Benitez-Thompson and Rep. Nick Rahall (D-WV).

That makes it a +6 delegate week for Obama officially, +7 unofficially.

Update III: And another super delegates signed up last Tuesday as well -- Georgia Democratic Party chairwoman Jane Kidd.

So make that +7 officially, +8 unofficially.
 
http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2008/3/10/11748/6707
 

 

Tags: Politics  
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Clinton Cheating Again-Already Changed Puerto Rico From Caucus To Primary

 
HILL'S SCHEME MACHINE

 

');
March 10, 2008 -- With the two Democratic presidential candidates seemingly poised for a duel to the death, and one of the two being Sen. Hillary Clinton, you can be sure of one thing: The stage is set for some world-class skullduggery.

Indeed, the procedural funny stuff is no doubt already under way.

Take last Thursday's decision in Puerto Rico to switch from a caucus - a format that so far has favored Sen Barack Obama - to an outright primary, Clinton's stronger suit.

And wouldn't you just know it? The party chairman in Puerto Rico is an ardent Clinton backer. Hmm . . .

Now, that contest won't be held until June 1. Meanwhile, the next big battleground is Pennsylvania, with some 188 delegates (including superdelegates) up for grabs. It's slated for April 22.

And it's ripe for shenanigans.

Indeed, Gov. Ed Rendell - a diehard Hillary loyalist whose wife owes her job as a federal appellate judge to Bill Clinton - is the kind of guy who, as Carrie Budoff Brown wrote on Politico.com, "knows where to find votes."

Rendell has ardently opposed all efforts to fight voter fraud.

Last month, citing bad weather, he extended the deadline for filing delegate slates. That unilaterally helped Hillary, whose delegates hadn't all filed yet; Obama's folks, by contrast, completed all their filings on time.

Then, of course, there's the monster fight over whether to redo the primaries in Michigan and Florida. The Dems' national bosses banned delegates from those states because they broke party rules and held their primaries too early. But then (as we noted last week), rules don't really mean much to Democrats, particularly those like Clinton.

As these - and other - matters are hammered out, Obama would be wise to beware of ceding any advantage.

That can happen not only in determining what to do about Michigan and Florida but also in any new attempt to change the rules in remaining contests.

And, of course, in the race for superdelegates, who are free to vote as they like.

Beyond that, there are the cheap shots and the low blows - as, for example, when Clinton hedged on whether Obama is a Muslim, acknowledging that he isn't one "as far as I know."

Let's face it: The Hill-and-Bill machine has a record of scandal and sneakiness that runs all the way back to Arkansas. And the potential for dirty tricks is huge.

In the end, the outcome of the Democratic race may depend on the meaning of the word "is" or, say, on the whereabouts of the Rose Law Firm billing records . . . (Hey, don't blame us for dredging down that deep. It was Clinton flack Howard Wolfson who was talking about special prosecutor Ken Starr last week.)
 
Fortunately for Obama, he's a veteran of Chicago's seedy politics, and so he's likely prepared for what may be in store.
But far better if everyone just played fair from the start.
 
http://www.nypost.com/seven/03102008/postopinion/editorials/hills_scheme_machine_101191.htm

Tags: Politics  
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Senator Clinton-You Said Slumlord Rezko-Did You Mean Slumlord Bill Clinton?

 
 
Clinton Link In Brazil Ethanol Probe
SAO PAULO, Brazil, Mar. 10, 2008
(AP) A team from Brazil's Labor Ministry found "degrading" living conditions for 133 sugarcane workers employed by an ethanol company whose investors include former President Clinton and other high-profile financial players.

At five sites inspected, workers "complained they were suffering from hunger and cold, and all of the locations were overcrowded and with terrible sanitary conditions," according to a statement issued Friday by Jaqueline Carrijo, who led the inspections last month.

The target of the probe, Brazil Renewable Energy Co., known as Brenco, apologized over the weekend and said it is fixing the problems at its rural operations, which turn sugarcane into ethanol.

Clinton's connection is via an investment in Brenco by The Yucaipa Cos., a U.S.-based fund in which Clinton was a senior advisor until last year. His investment in Brenco is valued between $15,001 and $50,000, according to a financial dislosure report submitted last year by his wife, presidential candidate Hillary Rodham Clinton.
 
http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2008/03/10/ap/world/main3922931.shtml
 
Tags: Politics  
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

My Prayers Go Out To Spitzers Family-But Hey Hannity Are You Going To Link Clinton To Spitzer

 
 
Hey Hannity, you smeared Obama with Farrakhan and Ayers, now are you going to smear Clinton with Spitzer; or do you only smear black people?
 
Tags: Politics  
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Clinton Stop Lying About Samantha Powers-General Powell Said The Same Thing

 
 
Obama has been consistent-He said we have to be as careful getting out as we were careless getting in; meaning he would not endanger the troops getting out; any fool would know that if there was a sudden flair up; Obama would have to lock that down on the way out.
 
That's a lot different than what you call deceiving the American people.
 
Clinton, I'm sick of your lying, triangulation and all of that garbage.
 
You are just trying to bloody Obama, just like Rush said, so McCain can win.
 
Same old Clinton; just like you did to Dinkins so that Guilliani could win.
 
In addition, General Powell said the same thing as Samanth Powers; that the conditions on the ground has to be considered; that is not inconsistent with what Obama said all along.
 
You are just trying to cover up that you lied to the American people about NAFTA.
Tags: Politics  
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Hey Hannity-Are You Going To Report That Clinton Released Domestic Terrorist?

 
 
Hannity, you are trying to smear Obama with Ayers.  Are you going to also smear Clinton with Susan Rosenberg, another Weather Undergrounder?
 

" President Clinton pardoned another one-time member of the Weather Underground, Susan L. Rosenberg, after she had served 16 years in prison on federal charges.

Rosenberg had been arrested in 1984 while unloading 740 pounds of dynamite, a submachine gun and other weapons from the back of a car.

Rosenberg admitted the materials were to supply others for politically-motivated attacks. Authorities had been searching for Rosenberg since 1981, for what they believed was her role in the robbery of a Brinks truck in Rockland County, N.Y. The attack, for which Rosenberg was thought to have aided with surveillance and getaway driving, left two police officers and a guard dead.

Rosenberg has denied playing a role in the Brinks heist. In arguing for a pardon in 2001, she noted that she had been a model prisoner.

And in 1999, President Clinton also pardoned 16 violent Puerto Rican nationalists responsible for more than 100 bombings of U.S. political and military installations, after they promised to renounce violence. The attacks reportedly killed six people and wounded dozens more. In justifying the pardons, President Clinton noted none of the men had been convicted of crimes that resulted in death or injuries.

http://abcnews.go.com/Blotter/story?id=4330128&page=1

 
 
 
Tags: Politics  
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Hey Hannity-You Try to Link Avery To Obama-Are You Going To Also Link Clinton Friend Cokie Roberts To Her Racist Father Hale Boggs?

 
 
Cokie Roberts, is a friend of Hillary Clinton's, and whose father was one of the biggest southern racist, a signer of the obstructionist and racist Southern Manfesto, against school integration.
 
Are you going to be fair and link Clinton and Roberts to Robert'a father's racist past; as you are trying to link Obama to Ayer's Weather Underground past; or are you part of the hate-black people-first-crowd; who use any excuse to be against Obama? 
Tags: Politics  
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Great Work!!!

 
 
Excellent job on the Sunday Talk Shows, Claire McCaskill, and John Kerry; plus Bill Bradley last week in full attack mode.
 
Also great work Obama, going into the attack mode last week without getting into the gutter with Clinton.
 
Tax returns and library financial disclosures are fair game.
Tags: Politics  
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Gloria Steinem Can Spew Filthy Cursing all Over The Place And The Press Say Nothing-Yet Michelle Gets Crucified Everytime She Opens Her Mouth!!!

 
 
The hate-black-people-first-crowd rakes Michelle over the coals everytime she says something, yet Clinton friends such as Steinem can get away with spewing all kinds of filth; while the press remains silent.
***
 
This is a WorldNetDaily printer-friendly version of the article which follows.
To view this item online, visit http://www.worldnetdaily.com/index.php?pageId=58108
 
 
 Sunday, March 09, 2008

POLITICALLY DIRECT
'I am woman, hear me whine'
Exclusive: Jane Chastain skewers Hillary for sidling up to old-guard feminists

Posted: March 06, 2008
1:00 am Eastern

By Jane Chastain


Thanks to Hillary Rodham Clinton, Helen Reddy will have to go back and rewrite the feminist's theme song she penned in the early '70s. "I am Woman Hear Me Roar" obviously doesn't cut it anymore.

With her back against the wall before the Democratic presidential primary in New Hampshire, Hillary cried. With her back against the wall in Texas, she whined.

Last week, in an interview with ABC News' Cynthia McFadden, Clinton wanted us to believe that it's tougher for her to run as a woman than it is for her black, male opponent. "It's hard," she whined. "It's hard being a woman out there. It is obviously challenging with some of the things that are said that are not even personal to me so much as they are about women."

Ahhhhh, I get it! If she loses the nomination to Obama, she wants us to believe it has nothing to do with her but everything to do with our prejudices. Yes, the Obama surge obviously means there are more misogynists out there than racists!

To make matters worse, Clinton had the old feminist warhorse Gloria Steinem on the stump for her reminding us of everything we hate about the radical feminist movement. Speaking before an audience of 200 in Austin, Texas, Steinem praised the little gathering, calling it "fan-f---ing- tastic!"(Column continues below)


While Obama was packing them in, Steinem was delivering this garbage! Do these women really think they have to use obscenities to be heard? Frankly, I am surprised they could find 200 hard-core, old-guard feminists in Texas. Maybe they bused them in.

Steinem had the audacity to denigrate John McCain's service record and his capture and torture at the hands of the Viet Cong. She railed, "Suppose John McCain had been Joan McCain and Joan McCain had got captured, shot down and been a POW for eight years. They (the media) would ask, 'What did you do wrong to get captured?'"

This is a wake-up call! Let it serve as a reminder that Hillary Clinton's disdain for the military is well-documented. Feminists like Clinton and Steinem see the military as a laboratory for social experimentation. They have promoted the theory that men and women are interchangeable fungibles to make women eligible for the draft and combat. They want enlisted women used as cannon fodder just so women officers can sit on the Joint Chiefs of Staff. Yes, if there has to be a military, they want women to run it!

They decry the amount of money spent on Iraq but say nothing about the billions wasted on power steering for our military vehicles so women can drive them, or the redesign of our weapons and combat planes so women can fire them and fly them. In their all-inclusive military, we'll be building tanks with wheelchair ramps!

Can this kinder-gentler military win wars? To do that – however distasteful – you have to kill people and break things. Steinem made my point: "I am so grateful that she (Clinton) hasn't been trained to kill anybody. And she probably didn't even play war games as a kid. It's a great relief from Bush in his jumpsuit and from Kerry saluting."

Don't get me wrong. I would love to see the right woman as commander in chief, someone cut out of the mold of Margaret Thatcher, someone like Elaine Donnelly of the Center for Military Readiness – not a "Johnnie come lately" like Hillary Clinton.

America has had it with whining, radical feminists. It's time to move on! They do not – nor have they ever – represented real women. Hillary has spent her entire career riding on her husband's coattails, while Steinem was peddling her toxic ideology to women who could not, or would not, think for themselves.

During that time, I managed to become the first woman sportscaster on both the local and national level without any help from the feminists. I did it with hard work, not by demanding acceptance or the right to break in line. In fact, when the feminists began burning their bras, it made my job a lot harder than it should have been. They once burned me in effigy because I would not march to the beat of their drum, so don't bother lecturing me about women's rights, until you have broken as many barriers for women as I have.

In that ABC interview, Hillary also said, "I don't expect any sympathy."

Don't worry, Hillary, you won't get it from me! Frankly, should there be a crisis, and the phone at the White House rings in the middle of the night, the thought of you answering it gives me cold chills.

 
 
 
 
 
Tags: Politics  
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (2) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

The Revolting Arrogance Of The Clintons-The Superbowl Champion Giants Lead The Jets 24-6-The Jets Tell The Giants "We'll Kick A 3-Point Field Goal And Let You Finish Second"

 
Clinton is in second place on all counts, behind in delegates, behind in popular votes, behind in states won.
 
She lost Texas in delegates 84 to Obama's 89.  She just lost the Wyoming caucuses, yet she pretends to offer the VP slot to Obama.
 
This causes a suspension of belief.  The Clinton campaign has either lost its mind; is on some kind of drugs; or has no respect for the intelligence of the American people.
 
For her camp to pretend to offer the VP to Obama, while she is running behind; is in fact a joke and an okeydoke trick designed to saddle up to Obama, muddy the waters and try to siphon off his votes through appearing to be just like Obama; at a time while simultaneously saying Obama is not fit to President.  If she can fool the people into thinking that there is no difference between her and Obama; she can convince the people that a vote for her is a vote for Obama.
 
It appears to be very sophisticated; but in my book; it's still a Goebbles-lie.
 
For her to offer the VP slot to Obama is like the New York Jets, who are losing to the World Champion New York Giants, by 18 points, 24-6, with 3 seconds left in the 4th quarter, kicking a 3-point field goal, and offering the Giants the opportunity to finish second.
 
This is the type of Clinton scatter-brained bad judgement which allows her to offer such non-sense and make a party-traitorous endorsement of McCain over Obama, and the DNC, Howard Dean, John Edwards, Al Gore, say nothing about it.
 
If Obama had endorsed McCain over Clinton, Edwards and Gore would have thrown their endorsement to Clinton the next day.
 
 
Tags: Politics  
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

It's The Gall-It's The Venom-It's The Arrogance-Of The Clinton Campaign

 



http://www.newsday.com/news/columnists/ny-oppay095606302mar09,0,7110137.column

Newsday.com

Hillary Clinton's venom, gall are a turnoff

Les Payne

March 9, 2008

Is it too early for Hillary Rodham Clinton to suggest Barack Obama as her vice president on the ticket? Yes, absolutely. The answer for Clinton, however, appears to depend on your definition of what "smidgen" is.

Only "smidgens of difference," she said, separate them in the critical delegate count needed to win the Democratic presidential nomination. The operative word is derived from "smidge," or "barely detectable." For example, the 5,963,110 votes that Florida counted in the 2000 election allowed Gov. Jeb Bush to award his brother George W. a disputed victory. His margin of 537 votes - .0009 percent - was a smidgen.

The difference in delegates between the Democrats is about 7 percent - not a smidgen. Though neither has enough to win, it is Obama, with 1,567, not Clinton, with 1,462, who's leading. Still, she reckons the vice president option is hers to name.

When CBS pitched the "dream ticket" idea to Clinton, in fairness, she first allowed, "We have to decide who's on top of the ticket." Then, with a straight face, she added, "I think the people of Ohio [where she'd just won handily] very clearly said it should be me." It is just such humorless gall and an awkward sense of entitlement that turns voters off to the junior senator of Chappaqua via Arkansas and suburban Chicago.

Nowhere has this turnoff been more dramatic than among African-Americans, whose votes for Clinton and her husband in all their previous elections spiraled upward from 80 percent. It's not that Obama has wowed blacks as much as that the Clintons are duplicitous with them.

First she rolled the dice and demeaned the iconic civil rights struggle of the Rev. Martin Luther King Jr. in favor of President Lyndon B. Johnson; then her husband blackjacked Obama's South Carolina victory by handcuffing him to civil rights leader Jesse Jackson.

Sacrificed once again on the altar of the Clintons' ambitions, their ever-loyal black voters looked for the exit. For once, they found a viable alternative in candidate Obama. Unlike the clubhouse politicians, the masses of black voters owe no outstanding debts to the Clintons. Indeed, the common good African-Americans enjoyed during the eight Clinton years has been largely reversed, while the evil he entrenched lives on.


This permanent harm blacks suffer includes President Clinton's welfare reform without sufficient safety netting; the removal of the FCC tax incentive for media ownership by minorities and women; and his extension of the federal policy mandating a 100-to-1 crack-to-powder cocaine prison sentencing.

Last week Bill Clinton, quite belatedly, said, "I regret more than I can say that we didn't do more" to end the disparate crack-to-cocaine sentencing. "I'm prepared to spend a significant portion of whatever life I've got left on the Earth trying to fix this, because I think it's a cancer," the former president said during a keynote speech at a University of Pennsylvania symposium commemorating the 40th anniversary of the Kerner Commission report on the civil unrest of the '60s. "We sentenced with a shotgun rather than a rifle," he said of the racist federal policy that disproportionately herds thousands of blacks off to prisons for long stretches - unjustly.

Hillary Clinton shies away from such Draconian policies of her husband's administration while taking full credit for the good times. When convenient, she will conjure victimization as a woman; when pressed she'll sic her junkyard spouse, fangs bared with the Deep South politics of the past century. As with King and in South Carolina, the tactic that troubles most is the thinly veiled appeals to that false sense of white supremacy, hinting that Obama is lazy, lacking in substance and given overmuch to smooth talking and likely drugs. This venomous impulse is suppressed to the point of denial in many older Americans - and not yet conditioned into the young. Within this generation of unspoiled voters resides the best hope of the nation.

In looking toward the Pennsylvania primary, and back at Florida and Michigan, the Democrats should keep to the high ground. Raw, nondemocratic personal ambitions, to say nothing of greed, avarice and stupidity, are what landed the country in the current quagmire. It's high time our political leaders wrest the government from the Bush-Cheney death grip and get back to nudging this republic toward a more perfect union.

Tags: Politics  
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (2) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Clinton Played The Race Card And The Fear Card-Now The Clinton-McCain-S King Ticket Plays The Jihad Card

 
 

GOP's King: Obama win would cause jihadi joy

by Frank James

Rep. Steve King, an Iowa Republican, has a vision of what the world will look like if Sen. Barack Obama wins the White House. There will be a lot of dancing and celebrating in the streets.

But the streets he's talking about aren't in Illinois, South Carolina or California. No, the streets he's talking about are on the other side of the globe. Check out these comments he made during an interview in at KICD radio in Spencer, Iowa as reported by the Spencer Daily Reporter.

It was during a stop at the KICD studios in north Spencer that he also talked about the presidential campaign and his decision not to run for the U.S. Senate seat held by Tom Harkin. King said he would support presumptive GOP nominee John McCain in part because of alternatives coming from the Democratic Party.

 

"I don't want to disparage anyone because of their race, their ethnicity, their name - whatever their religion their father might have been," he said. "I'll just say this: When you think about the option of a Barack Obama potentially getting elected President of the United States -- I mean, what does this look like to the rest of the world? What does it look like to the world of Islam?"

He continued: "I will tell you that, if he is elected president, then the radical Islamists, the al-Qaida, the radical Islamists and their supporters, will be dancing in the streets in greater numbers than they did on September 11 because they will declare victory in this War on Terror."

King thinks radical Islamists will say the United States has capitulated because the Obama administration would be pulling troops out of any conflict associated with al-Qaida.

"Additionally, his middle name (Hussein) does matter," King said. "It matters because they read a meaning into that in the rest of the world. That has a special meaning to them. They will be dancing in the streets because of his middle name. They will be dancing in the streets because of who his father was and because of his posture that says: Pull out of the Middle East and pull out of this conflict."

He continued: "There are implications that have to do with who he is and the position that he's taken. If he were strong on national defense and said 'I'm going to go over there and we're going to fight and we're going to win, we'll come home with a victory,' that's different. But that's not what he said. They will be dancing in the streets if he's elected president. That has a chilling aspect on how difficult it will be to ever win this Global War on Terror."

King made his remarks after describing how the presidential campaign played a factor in his decision to run for a fourth term in Congress instead of the U.S. Senate seat held by Harkin.

 

The Obama campaign, according to CNN, has denounced King's comments and demanded that Sen. John McCain, winner of the Republican presidential nomination, do likewise.

While King's comments can be considered another waystation in the discussion over what Obama's critics are trying to stir up when they use his middle name, it's actually more than that.

As much as many opponents of the Iraq War don't often discuss it, King raises the legitimate issue of what the reaction of al Qaeda and other terrorist groups, as well as U.S.'s nation-state antagonists, like the Iranian government, would be to a deliberately fast withdrawal by the U.S. from Iraq.

We know, from his own words, how Osama bin Laden interpreted the U.S.'s rapid exit from Beirut following the 1983 Marine barracks bombing and the U.S. pull out from Somalia following "Black Hawk Down."

They were read by bin Laden as signs of U.S. weakness that encouraged bin Ladin's thinking in the planning for the 9/11 attacks.

So King raises a concern that has been echoed by some national-security experts, that is, that the commencement of a significant withdrawal following the election of the next president could once again signal weakness to al Qaeda.

While some of King's comments will be viewed by many as intolerant, it remains for the Obama campaign, since its candidate has said U.S. troops in the main would be withdrawn within 16 months of his taking office, and to a lesser extent, the campaign of Sen. Hillary Clinton, to make an effective counterargument to the part of King's verbiage having to do with the message a decampment by U.S. troops from Iraq would send to the nation's sworn enemies.

If Obama and Clinton think withdrawal wouldn't send such a signal, why do they think that? And if they think it could, how would they deal with the emboldened al Qaeda that would result?

http://www.swamppolitics.com/news/politics/blog/2008/03/gops_king_obama_win_would_caus.html#more
 
Tags: Politics  
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Hey Hannity And Rush-Your Worst Nightmare-Obama Already Has Coattails And We Are Still In The Primary Season

 

www.chicagotribune.com/news/politics/chi-foster-wins-hasterts-seat-080308,0,7539185.story

chicagotribune.com

Democrat Foster wins Hastert's seat

Tribune staff reporter

9:20 PM CST, March 8, 2008

In a stunning upset Saturday that could be a harbinger of trouble for the GOP this fall, a little-known Democratic physicist won the special election for a seat drawn to re-elect former Republican House Speaker Dennis Hastert.

Bill Foster defeated Republican Jim Oberweis, who lost his fourth high-profile election in six years, following an expensive and highly negative contest.

The win gives Democrats another House seat until at least the end of the year. It also could serve as an omen for November, when two other Illinois congressional seats are up for grabs following Republican retirements and Sen. Barack Obama could bring out a huge turnout if he's the Democratic presidential nominee.

Foster won with 52 percent to Oberweis' 48 percent with nearly all of the unofficial vote counted late Saturday.

Tags: Politics  
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

You've Heard That Senator Clinton Won Texas-Look At The Real Facts-Obama Won Texas Delegates-Why Is The Press Keeping This Quiet?

 
Obama wins Texas delegates 89 to 84.
 
 
8247 of 8247 Precincts Reporting
March 4, 2008

CLINTON
51% 1,459,814 84

OBAMA
47% 1,358,785 89  
 
 
http://election.cbsnews.com/campaign2008/state.shtml?state=TX
Republican
Primary Results

County Results  Exit Poll
7959 of 7959 Precincts Reporting
March 4, 2008

MCCAIN
51% 709,477 99

HUCKABEE
38% 523,554 12  

PAUL
5% 69,954 0  
Tags: Politics  
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive