About Me

Name:Black Knight
Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Blog Roll

 

Black people-It is clear that Bush-Clinton-Clinton-McCain-Lieberman-ABC- are against Obama and all black people-What are we going to do when they steal the election?

 
 
Clinton-Clinton has an end game-Steal the election from Obama.
 
McCain-Bush-Lieberman have an end game-Help Clinton-Clinton steal the election from Obama.
 
The Democratic party has an end game-Let Clinton beat up and bloody Obama so that Clinton wins or McCain wins.  We know this to be true because if Clinton had the most delegates, the most states won, and lead in the popular vote, as Obama has, the Party would have asked Obama to step aside, or the super delegates would have thrown their selection to the white lady-Clinton by now.
 
Since they have not done so for the black man leader Obama, proves that their end game is to assist Clinton in stealing the election from Obama or to help McCain win.
 
Malcom X knew what he was talking about when he said the Democrats and Republicans were/are in "cohoots."  He was right.
 
 
Therefore, Black people what is our end game?
 
(1). After all these millions of votes and the expending all of this tremendous energy, will we once again accept like Jesse did, a prime time speaking slot at the convention?
 
(2). Is that all we are worth to the Democratic Party?
 
(3). Will we black people accept that?
 
(4).  The Party is counting on us to once again vote for the ticket and not vote for McCain.  The Party argues that a vote for McCain is a vote for more Scalias and Robertses.
 
I say that's the Party's problem.  The Supreme Court has not been relevant to black people since the Warren Court, so that argument should get no sympathy from us!!!
 
(5). The Party argues that a vote for McCain is a vote for a 100 year Iraq War.
 
I say that too is the Party's problem:  McCain will send their sons and daughters to die in the war.  Our sons and daughters are already over there dying.
 
I say welcome to the club!!!
 
(6). The Party says that if black people walk, the Party will be shatterd for the next 40 years, leading to Republican elections, recessions and depressions in the economy which will adversely affect black people more.
 
I say the Party ought to think about that before they steal this election.  Black people are already shattered- have been in a depression for the past 100 years; unemployment 4 or 5 times higher than whites; drop-out rate 6-7 times higher.  Nothing has changed. So don't blame us for destroying the Party.  Blame the lying cheating Clintons and those who enable them.
 
(7). Black people-will you be molified if Clinton steals the election and taps Obama as running mate?
 
I would say at that point that "principle is bigger than Obama."  If he joins the lies, the cheating, the thievery of the Clintons, then we would have to part company and wish him well.
 
JFK and Johnson did not like one another, but Kennedy did nothing to cheat against Johnson to win the nomination.
 
Bush called Reagan's policies "voodoo economics" but Reagan did nothing to cheat against Bush to win the nomination.
 
The Clintons are the lowest of the low-below the belt-gutter-lowest common denominator-treasonous-Never in the modern history of primaries has a Democratic challenger praised the Republican challenger over a fellow Democrat.  That alone should have brought all of the superdelgates over to Obama's side.
 
So if Obama wants to be on that stolen-treasonous ticket with Clinton, that's his business; that has nothing to do with black people.
 
At that point we would have to chart our own course; but I don't think Obama would do that; and I don't think Michelle would let Obama do that.  They appear to have too much integrity to be a part of the Clinton train-wreck-awaiting-to-happen Administration.
 
(8). So black people what is our end game?
 
(9). I would advise our end game to be this:
 
   Jesse, Al, The NAACP, The Urban League, All the Black Greek Organizations, all the young people brought to the polls by Obama; Rev Al and Jesse representing 35 million black people, and representatives of the young people, white, Hispanic, Asian and Native Americans representing at least another 35 million people, should go on national TV and announce right now, that if the Clintons steal this nomination, that he, Jesse, and Al will organize and lead 70 million Americans out of the Democratic Party and over to the Republican Party.
 
Say to the Party-intentionally destroy Obama and we will intentionally fight back.  Just like John Edwards said on another subject, "you can't reason with these people; you have to fight them power for power."
 
Some will say, isn't that black mail; if you don't do what black people want, we'll leave?
 
Only an idiot would say that.
 
We are saying conduct a fair election or we'll leave.
 
If the Clintons win fair and square we'll accept it; but if it is stolen, we are out of here!!!
 
I'd rather be in the pure _ell of the Republican Party, than to be in the pure _ell of so-called friends in the Democratic Party.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Tags: Politics  
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

The Clinton-Ignatius-Operation Overlord-Normandy attack gainst Obama continues!!!

 
  

Obama and the Chicago Insider

By David Ignatius

Sunday, April 20, 2008; Page B07

The trial of Barack Obama's wheeler-dealer friend, Antoin "Tony" Rezko, was back in the news last week because of a disagreement over whether Obama did or didn't attend a party at Rezko's house for an Iraqi-born billionaire named Nadhmi Auchi.

A prosecution witness testified that Obama and his wife were guests at the April 3, 2004, gathering in the Chicago suburb of Wilmette. The Obama campaign responded that neither of the Obamas recalled attending such an event. Auchi similarly has "no recollection of meeting Senator Obama at any party in 2004 or at any other time," according to his lawyer, Alasdair Pepper.

The testimony was a reminder of the vortex of business and politics swirling around Rezko -- and of Obama's curious 17-year friendship with the indicted Chicago businessman. The Clintons rightly have gotten hammered over the years for their friendships with political fixers. And although Obama complained in Wednesday night's debate about "distractions" in the campaign, his long association with Rezko is worth a careful look.

The mystery about the Rezko matter, for me, is why Obama stood by the Syrian-born businessman as his legal troubles mounted. The answer, near as I can tell, is the same one that emerged in the debate over inflammatory statements made by the Rev. Jeremiah Wright, Obama's former pastor. Obama remains doggedly loyal to his friends, especially those who embraced him when he first came to Chicago as a young man struggling to find his place in the world.

Obama met Rezko in the early 1990s as he was finishing up at Harvard Law School. Rezko was well connected in Chicago's African American community, in part because he had worked with Jabir Herbert Muhammad, the son of Nation of Islam founder Elijah Muhammad, when he was managing the career of boxer Muhammad Ali, according to a May 2005 profile in the Chicago Tribune.

 
 http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/04/18/AR2008041802707.html
Tags: Politics  
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Ethel Kennedy-Bobby's wife-backs Obama!!!

 
 
  

Barack Obama endorsed by Robert Kennedy's widow Ethel Kennedy

By Philip Sherwell

Last Updated: 4:25pm BST 19/04/2008

Ethel Kennedy, the matriarch of America's greatest political dynasty, is back on the campaign trail for the first time since an assassin’s bullet brutally ended the presidential run of her husband Robert 40 years ago.

# Full coverage of the US Elections 2008

# Trail Mix 2008: Media: Obama's not-so-secret weapon?

Just days after turning 80 on April 11, Mrs Kennedy was leading three generations of her family seeking votes across Pennsylvania for Barack Obama, a politician whose crowd-drawing ability and soaring rhetoric has often earned comparisons with both Robert, killed in June 1968, and his brother, President John F Kennedy, who was assassinated in 1963.

Robert Kennedy, Barack Obama

Barack Obama's oratory and charisma have drawn comparions with the Kennedy brothers

In her public endorsement of Mr Obama, Mrs Kennedy said: "Barack is so like Bobby...With courage, caring, and charisma, Senator Obama is leading us toward a kinder, gentler world."

After greeting residents of a senior citizens home in Scranton and leading a round of "Irish Eyes", she told The Sunday Telegraph: "He's such an inspiring man and he'll be a great president for our country.

"He's just what we need, a breath of fresh air." An energetic figure in blue blazer, grey trousers and pink scarf and sweater, she left the family compound in Hyannisport, Massachusetts, at dawn and flew to Pennsylvania for a long day of Get Out The Vote events at community centres, old people’s homes and college campuses. Long after dark, she was still shaking hands and urging people to vote for Mr Obama in Tuesday's primary.

And between campaign stops, she demonstrated a political mind as sharp as ever as she discussed singer Bruce Springsteen's endorsement of Mr Obama and tactics for a major Democratic dinner in the area this weekend.

Mrs Kennedy was accompanied in Scranton by two of her surviving nine children - son Max, 42, and daughter Rory, 39, with whom she was pregnant when Robert was shot dead - and Max's wife and his daughters, aged 13 and nine.

advertisement

"It's remarkable. I have never seen Mom so energised by an election. She really means this," said Max, an attorney and writer.

Information appearing on telegraph.co.uk is the copyright of Telegraph Media Group Limited and must not be reproduced in any medium without licence. For the full copyright statement see Copyright

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2008/04/19/wkennedy119.xml
 
Tags: Politics  
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

ABC is part of the Clinton Operation Overlord attack against Obama

 
 

Outrage as ex-Clinton staffer runs debate

ABC journalist Charles Gibson (centre) is under fire for his questions in the televised debate between senators Clinton and Obama.

ABC journalist Charles Gibson (centre) is under fire for his questions in the televised debate between senators Clinton and Obama.
Photo: Reuters

 
Lucy Battersby
April 17, 2008 - 2:36PM

US voters have expressed outrage over the decision to allow Bill Clinton's former press secretary to moderate today's debate between Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama.

The two Democratic senators went head-to-head in Philadelphia in the run-up to the Pennsylvania primary on April 22.

The debate was moderated by ABC journalists George Stephanopoulos, a former Clinton staffer, and Charles Gibson.

More than 7000 viewers posted comments on the American Broadcasting Corporation (ABC) news website criticising the "biased" and "superficial" questions posed by Stephanopoulos, the network's Washington correspondent.

Stephanopoulos helped run Mr Clinton's 1992 election campaign and acted as his press secretary and advisor on policy and strategy before joining the ABC.

"A very biased debate, both Charlie and George attacked Obama tonight," wrote Admiralboy21.

"George Stephanopoulos was on Bill Clinton's administrative staff at one point, why was he asking the questions. ABC did a TERRIBLE job with the debate!!"

Zorbakrufus wrote: "ABC News has officially lost any semblance of credibility it ever had for me.
 
http://www.theage.com.au/news/us-election/chair-lift-for-hillary/2008/04/17/1208025351372.html
Tags: Politics  
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

The ABC debate was slanted against Obama-Tom Shales

 
 
"To this observer, ABC's coverage seemed slanted against Obama. The director cut several times to reaction shots of such Clinton supporters as her daughter, Chelsea, who sat in the audience at the Kimmel Theater in Philly's National Constitution Center. Obama supporters did not get equal screen time, giving the impression that there weren't any in the hall.(TS)."
 
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/04/17/AR2008041700013.html
Tags: Politics  
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Hillary says "Scew Working class Whites"- At least Obama tried to explain them

 
Sam Stein-Huffington Post

Hillary Clinton On Southern Working Class Whites In 1995: "Screw 'Em"

April 16, 2008

 

During the past week, Sen. Hillary Clinton has presented herself as a working class populist, the politician in touch with small town sentiments, compared to the elitism of her opponent, Sen. Barack Obama.

But a telling anecdote from her husband's administration shows Hillary Clinton's attitudes about the "lunch-bucket Democrats" are not exactly pristine.

In January 1995, as the Clintons were licking their wounds from the 1994 congressional elections, a debate emerged at a retreat at Camp David. Should the administration make overtures to working class white southerners who had all but forsaken the Democratic Party? The then-first lady took a less than inclusive approach.

"Screw 'em," she told her husband. "You don't owe them a thing, Bill. They're doing nothing for you; you don't have to do anything for them."

The statement -- which author Benjamin Barber witnessed and wrote about in his book, "The Truth of Power: Intellectual Affairs in the Clinton White House" -- was prompted by another speaker raising the difficulties of reaching "Reagan Democrats." It stands in stark contrast to the attitude the New York Democrat has recently taken on the campaign trail, in which she has presented herself as the one candidate who understands the working-class needs...
 
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/04/16/hillary-clinton-on-workin_n_97017.html
 
Tags: Politics  
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Did Ayers make his statement about 911 on 911 or 912?

 
 
First of all, Ayers made no reported statement about 911, on  911, period!!!
 
If this statement of Ayer's was printed in the New York Times on 911, then Ayer's could not have been talking about 911.
 
Sarah Baxter-4/13/2008-Timesonline
 
"In an interview in The New York Times on the day of the September 11 attacks, when he was promoting Fugitive Days, his book on the Weathermen, Ayers said: “I don’t regret setting bombs,” and added: “I feel we didn’t do enough.”
 
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/us_and_americas/us_elections/article3736043.ece
***
 
Hannity has been smearing Obama with the above statement as if Ayers agrees with the 911 terrorist and feels "like he( and they) didn't do enough."
 
Nothing could be further from the truth.
 
The Ayers statement was made before 911 but published on 911.
 
One cannot talk about an event that has not happened, before it happens. The thought of that doesn't make any sense; and for Hannity and others to make that arguement makes one wonder how in the heck did they make it out of grade school, let alone make upwards of $50 million a year to present such gutter-garbage.
 
In order for Hannity to be remotely correct, Ayers would have had to have made the statement on 912, the day after 911.
 
There is no evidence that Ayers agrees with the 911 terrorists.
 
And there is no evidence that Obama agrees with either the 911 terrorists or Ayers.
 
But the Clinton-Clinton-Stephanopolous-Mike Savage-Limbaugh-Bush-Lieberman-Mark Penn-Charlie Black-McCain-Kristol-Charles Gibson-(McCarthy)Hannity-Allan (puny defense of Obama) Colmes-Joe Scarborough-Karl Rove-Newt Gingrich- axis Operation Overlord-Normandy attack against Obama rolls on, without fact checking or critical analysis by the media.
 
 
Tags: Politics  
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Elitist Clinton scorns cultural liberals!!!

 
Is there any honesty left in the Clinton campaign?
 
She does the things she accuses others of doing.
 
Clinton called Obama elitist because of some bad choice of words concerning small towns; now we find that she said similar "intentially" concerning cultural liberals.
 
Edwards was right-She'll do anything.
 
However, there is no outrage in the media.
 
Outrage is only reserved for the black man; yet the media says that they are not racist and Clinton says that the press is unfair to her!!!
 
Both lies, and the world can see it!!!
 
***

Clinton scorns the base

In a weird mirror image of last Friday's "cling" revelation — though perhaps without the same general election implications — this Friday afternoon brings a Huffington Post tape reportedly from a closed-door Hillary fundraiser in which Clinton scorns her opponent's supporters — the liberal activists who make up a pillar of the Democratic Party:

"MoveOn.org endorsed [Obama] — which is like a gusher of money that never seems to slow down," Clinton said to a meeting of donors. "We have been less successful in caucuses because it brings out the activist base of the Democratic Party. MoveOn didn't even want us to go into Afghanistan. I mean, that's what we're dealing with. And you know they turn out in great numbers. And they are very driven by their view of our positions, and it's primarily national security and foreign policy that drives them. I don't agree with them. They know I don't agree with them. So they flood into these caucuses and dominate them and really intimidate people who actually show up to support me."

Huffington Post says the comments — of which it provides tape, and which the campaign doesn't dispute — came from a small, closed-door fundraiser after Super Tuesday but before March 5; slightly oddly, it doesn't say where or when.

But there's some irony in the scorn for MoveOn, which Hillary courted and which was founded, after all, to save her husband from impeachment. What's striking here is the "us" and "them" view — the almost cultural scorn — toward a section of the Democratic Party to whom, at times in the White House, Hillary was seen as the ambassador for the more conservative Bill.

Also, though some people associated with MoveOn opposed the Afghan war, the group says it didn't.
 
http://www.politico.com/blogs/bensmith/0408/Clinton_scorns_the_base.html
Tags: Politics  
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Murdock pays Hannity $50 million a year or whatever Hannity's salary is to find out that Ayers only contributed $200 to Obama's campaign

 
 
 
I hope Murdock continues to pay Hannity $50 million dollars a year to find out that Ayers only contributed $200 to Obama's campaign.
 
This is great stuff:  $50 million investment to return $200; that is great news to all black Americans.
 
Because with that type of Return on Investment (ROI), (you invest $50 million to recieve back $200), Hannity will soon run Murdock and Fox right into the poor house and right out of business.
 
Keep it up Sean and do us all a favor!!!!
 
If wall street banks have people like Hannity running things, it's no wonder that they are on the verge of collapse!!!!
Tags: Politics  
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Hey coward Hannity-I bet you won't go after Mayor Daley!!!

 
Hey coward Hannity-Mayor Daley embraced Ayers.  I'll bet you won't go after the Mayor!!!
 
 
"But Ayers, who became a scholar at the University of Illinois-Chicago, was also eventually embraced by a pragmatic son of blue-collar Bridgeport desperately trying to upgrade Chicago's chronically troubled schools: Mayor Daley, whose father's legacy was tarnished because of anti-Vietnam War protesters getting clobbered in the 1968 convention and the "Days of Rage" the next year.(LS).
 
http://www.suntimes.com/news/sweet/901879,CST-NWS-sweet18.article
Tags: Politics  
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (2) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Matt Drudge calls Gloria Steinem a liar!!!

 
No, not to her face; just by the list that he has on his webpage.
 
Steinem says black men have had an easier time to the top than white women.
 
Not by the Drudge report.
 
There are 19 white women writers, no black women writers and only three black men writers.
 
In order for Steinem to be correct, 3 black men have to be more than 19 white women.
 
Only a derranged drug addict would come to such an insane conclusion.
 
1 Cindy Adams
2 Gloria Borger
3 Mona Charen
4 Eleanor Clift
5 Ann Coulter
6 Maureen Dowd
7 Susan Estrich
8 Leah Garchik
9 Ellen Goodman
10 Michelle Malkin
11 Peggy Noonan
12 Rosie O'donnell
13 Camille Paglia
14 Andrea Peyser
15 Anna Quindlen
16 Schlafly
17 Gail Shister
18 Liz Smith
19 Helen Thomas
 
 
 
Stanley Crouch
Larry Elder
Thomas Sowell
 
 
 
 
 MATT DRUDGE
3 AM GIRLS
CINDY ADAMS
MARC AMBINDER
KURT ANDERSEN
JONATHAN ALTER
ARMY ARCHERD
BAZ BAMIGBOYE
DAVE BARRY
PETER BART
STEPHEN BATTAGLIO
BIZARRE [SUN]
GLORIA BORGER
BRENT BOZELL
DAVID BRODER
DAVID BROOKS
PAT BUCHANAN
HOWIE CARR
MONA CHAREN
ELEANOR CLIFT
RICHARD COHEN
JOE CONASON
DAVID CORN
ANN COULTER
JIM CRAMER
CRAIG CRAWFORD
STANLEY CROUCH
LOU DOBBS
DE BORCHGRAVE
MAUREEN DOWD
STEVE DUNLEAVY
ROGER EBERT
LARRY ELDER
SUSAN ESTRICH
JOSEPH FARAH
SUZANNE FIELDS
HOWARD FINEMAN
NIKKI FINKE
FISHBOWL, DC
FISHBOWL, NYC
MICHAEL FLEMING
ROGER FRIEDMAN
JOHN FUND
LEAH GARCHIK
BILL GERTZ
GEORGIE GEYER
JIM GLASSMAN
JONAH GOLDBERG
ELLEN GOODMAN
MARTIN GROVE
MARK HALPERIN
CARL HIAASEN
NAT HENTOFF
PEREZ HILTON
CHRISTOPHER HITCHENS
HUGH HEWITT
INSIDE BELTWAY
INSIDE POLITICS
INSIDE THE RING
AL KAMEN
MICKEY KAUS
KEITH J. KELLY
MICHAEL KINSLEY
JOE KLEIN
HARRY KNOWLES
KRAUTHAMMER
NICHOLAS KRISTOF
PAUL KRUGMAN
LARRY KUDLOW
HOWIE KURTZ
JOHN LEO
DAVID LIMBAUGH
RUSH LIMBAUGH
HAL LINDSEY
RICH LOWRY
MICHELLE MALKIN
DICK MORRIS
PEGGY NOONAN
BOB NOVAK
ROSIE O'DONNELL
OFF THE RECORD
MARVIN OLASKY
BILL O'REILLY
PAGE SIX
CAMILLE PAGLIA
ANDREA PEYSER
BILL PRESS
WES PRUDEN
ANNA QUINDLEN
FRANK RICH
REX REED
RICHARD REEVES
RELIABLE SOURCE
RICHARD ROEPER
RUSH/MOLLOY
SCHLAFLY
TOM SHALES
GAIL SHISTER
LIZ SMITH
MICHAEL SNEED
JOE SOBRAN
THOMAS SOWELL
MARK STEYN
ANDREW SULLIVAN
HELEN THOMAS
CAL THOMAS
TV COLUMN
TV NEWSER
TV PROGRAMMING INSIDER
VEGAS CONFIDENTIAL
JEFFREY WELLS
WASHINGTON WHISPERS
GEORGE WILL
WALTER WILLIAMS
JAMES WOLCOTT
MORT ZUCKERMAN
BILL ZWECKER
Tags: Politics  
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

The DailyKos and the HuffingtonPost are all over the Clinton-McCain-Step-McCarthyHannity axis against Obama

 
I'm not the only one who knows that there is a vast array of people against Obama!!!
 
The DailyKos and Huff are all over this thing!!!

Below is the history of how we saw the Okie-Dokie coming a mile away and how a network Subverted Democracy.  President Barack should pull their Broadcasting License.

Tonight's debate will be moderated in part by ABC News Political Director, and former Clinton War Room lieutenant, George Stephanopoulos.  Yesterday, George was documented conspiring with TWO Right Wing Blowhards against Obama.  Expect a GOTCHA tonight, and ahead of that, We need to let ABC News know we are watching ...  If this is his standard, why not let Cheney Moderate the debate, or McCain even!

To put it bluntly, should a Former Clinton Official be the one asking GOP questions to Barack Tonight?!?

George spent time yesterday taking Notes on Sean Hannity's Show

MAJOR UPDATE

ABC contacted UIC for a photo of Ayers to be used tonight.  Granted, this may be simply for the sake of having it on hand, but it seemed pretty clear that it IS going to be coming up in the debate.

You know what to do!  /end update

When Hannity asked about the first question below about Ayers and whether George had plans to ask such a question, George replied, "Well, I'm taking notes now Sean." It did actually sound like he was pausing to take notes. And Hannity continued to feed him more:

  1. Ask Obama about his relationship with Ayers and WeatherUnderground and Axelrod's comments, "They're friendly"
  1. Ask Obama why he attended the Million Man March

Later Steph went on a lesser known show (at least to me) and was asked these questions.  Here's the Audio

Same Question

[For Obama] William Ayers is a man who was head of the Weather Underground, a radical group in the 60s and 70s, set bombs at the Capitol, set bombs at the Pentagon, and was quoted in the New York Times oddly enough, ironically on September 11 before obviously the events of that day, saying that he didn't go far enough, and he doesn't regret it at all, and he wished he could have done more. Your campaign has described your relationship with William Ayers as "friendly." How could a man running for the presidency of the United States possibly have anything to do with, or have anything but disdain for a man who did what he has done to this country?

Stephanopoulos responsed to the last query: "It's a damn good question."

Steve Malzberg's Bio

You will also find Steve regularly stopping by Fox & Friends and "Heartland" with John Kasich on the Fox News Channel. He has also appeared on Hannity & Colmes, Cavuto, The O’Reilly Factor, Dayside, and other shows on Fox, CNN and Court TV.

Steve is also a sought after speaker and a columnist for Newsmax.com. You can read his work and sign up for his free e-mail updates at www.newsmax.com/malzberg

So George Stephanopoulos is out there chatting with Newsmax columnists and Sean Hannity...

The Same George Stephanopoulos who is the Political Director of ABC, whose Good Morning America was the first National Network Program to break the Reverend Wright Story.  And the Very Same ABC that's owned by the Disney Corporation, whose other network, ESPN is in the news for Canceling not one but TWO Obama Exclusive Interviews at the executive level (edited with clarification by jethropaleorobber)

Let ABC Know what you think about this Garbage!  We Expect Objectivity, not force fed conspiracy guilt by association Gotcha Controversies (and Hannity wet dreams)

http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2008/4/16/13329/3501/457/496866
Tags: Politics  
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

The Clinton-Stepanopolous-McCarthy-Hannity-"we're white" Operation Overlord against Obama rolls on

 
The Clinton-Clinton-Mark Penn-Charlie Black-Bush-McCain-Kristol-Lieberman-Charles Gibson-George Stepanopolous-(McCarthy)Hannity axis Operation Overlord-Normandy attack against Obama rolls on.
 
Notice how Stepanopolous asked the same questions in the same sequence and in the same cadence as McCarthy-Hannity concerning Obama and Wright and Ayers, such as "how come you are friends with Weather Underground-Ayers, someone who bombed the Pentagon?"
 
Obama smacked that one right out of the park: "Bill Clinton parolled the Weather Underground, which is much more damning than my flimsey associations with Ayers," or words to that effect.
 
The point is the Clinton-Step-McCarthyHannity axis are all in it together against Obama.
Tags: Politics  
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Excellent Job Obama!!!

 
 
You won the debate hands down.
 
No question about it!!!
 
You would not be distracted by the Ayers and the other non-sense; you were right on point with the things that matter; housing; the war; the economy and the other stuff.
 
{{{{DRUDGE POLL}}}}WHO WON THE DEM DEBATE IN PA?...

HILLARY CLINTON
40% 38,117
BARACK OBAMA
60% 56,967

Total Votes: 95,084
Tags: Politics  
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Arianna nails Clinton!!!

 
 

Arianna Huffington

Posted April 14, 2008 | 01:41 PM (EST)

Clinton supporters say the darndest things.

Here's Sen. Evan Bayh, commenting on the political firestorm surrounding Barack Obama's remarks -- broken here on HuffPost's OffTheBus -- about economically-depressed small town voters: "The far right wing has a very good track record of using things like this relentlessly against our candidates, whether it's Al Gore or John Kerry. I'm afraid this is the kind of fodder they might use to harm him."

They? They? It's not the far right wing relentlessly using these comments for political gain, Senator. It's your candidate, Hillary Clinton, adopting the frames, lies, stereotypes and destructive clichés long embraced by the likes of Lee Atwater and Karl Rove. She has clearly decided that the road to victory runs through scorched earth.

The question is, if she succeeds, what kind of Party will she be left to lead? She's burning down the village to save it -- or to prove that she would make the best fire chief. But the village won't be saved; only one house will be left standing. A house with room for just two occupants. Hill and Bill.

Clinton's cynical distortion of Obama's remarks is in keeping with her campaign's modus operandi. On the foreign policy front, we've been fed a steady diet of her RNC-patented attacks: No Democrat can be trusted with national security -- except her. Obama hasn't crossed the threshold to be commander-in-chief. Etc.

Now she's turned to the domestic policy section of the RNC playbook, twisting Obama's words in a way that confirms every right-wing demagogic caricature of her own Party.

Yes, as Obama himself admits, he certainly could have chosen his words more artfully. Perhaps he should have borrowed Bill Clinton's 1992 campaign riff about "economically insecure white people who are scared to death." Maybe "scared to death" is less "elitist" than "bitter." But telling the truth, however inartfully, makes you "out of touch"? Give. Me. A. Break.

It has been an article of faith in the Democratic Party over the last twenty years that when small town, working class whites vote for Republicans they're voting against their economic self-interest. And why do they do that? Because every four years the Republican Party comes into those small towns and, to distract folks from the worsening economic situation, trots out a bunch of divisive, hot button social issues: "Let's not talk about why you don't have a job, can't afford health care, or can't send your kids to college; let's talk about gay marriage, school prayer, illegal immigration, and flag burning amendments." And Hillary is following the blueprint.

John McCain may as well take the next six months off, raise some money, maybe take a vacation -- because Hillary Clinton is out there doing his work for him.

This weekend she tried to paint herself as a good old boy, the kind of gal you'd want to have a beer with -- not like that "elitist" Barack Obama: "You know, my dad took me out behind the cottage that my grandfather built on a little lake called Lake Winola outside of Scranton and taught me how to shoot when I was a little girl." After she said this, she took a shot of whiskey. What's next, ads of Obama windsurfing? At 3 a.m.

But before Hillary Oakley runs out and bags her a few more ducks, Andrew Sullivan points out that of the top ten gun-owning states in the country, Obama has won six -- Hillary has won one. Cling to that.

But, of course, this isn't about guns or religion or fear of foreigners. It's about, as David Axelrod says, the (pardon the expression) bitterness and mistrust that stem from voters being "tired of politicians who come around at election time and express their solicitude as part of a tactic and don't follow through on it."

Jumping on the GOP talking points bandwagon, Clinton's new Mark Penn, Geoff Garin said: "These are the kinds of attitudes that have created a gulf between Democrats and lots of small-town and heartland voters that we've been working very, very hard to bridge." Karl Rove, who has devoted his life to making people believe that such a gulf exists, couldn't have scripted it better himself.

If Clinton's Rovian stoop-to-anything tactics succeed -- not at beating Obama but at making him an easier target for McCain -- the price will be paid by the very small-town Americans she is now pandering to. Americans already banished to economic oblivion by the same cynical tactics she's employing will be rewarded with four more years of downward economic mobility.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/arianna-huffington/john-mccain-should-go-on_b_96577.html

Tags: Politics  
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (2) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive