About Me

Name:Black Knight
Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Blog Roll

 

Clintons destroying the party!!!

 
 
 



Sam Stein

The Huffington Post

Joe Andrews: Clinton Destroying Party, Lacks Principle

May 1, 2008 11:28 AM

Joe Andrews, the former chairman of the Democratic National Committee in the late 1990s, warned on Thursday the actions of Sen. Hillary Clinton had the serious potential of tearing the Democratic Party apart.

"I had hoped, like Nancy Pelosi, that this [primary] decision could be have been made after the primaries were over," he told reporters during a conference call. "But I have grown concerned that the actions of one candidate, my former candidate, are going to hurt us in the fall... And so now I am calling upon my fellow superdelegates, however they make their decision, whatever they make it by, to do it now."

Andrews, a superdelegate who was appointed to the DNC by former president Bill Clinton and had endorsed Sen. Clinton, announced this morning that he was switching his support to Barack Obama. His primary reason? The divisiveness and lack of principle he believed was emanating from the Clinton campaign.

Specifically, Andrews pointed to Clinton's proposal for a gas-tax holiday -- an idea derided by economists but, likely, welcomed by voters -- as evidence that her candidacy promised not principle, but merely the opportunity to "play the political theater better than anyone else."

"The idea that we would step back from the real energy policy and environmental policy...for half a tank of gas," he said. "Is something that really was the straw that broke the camels back for me."
 
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/05/01/joe-andrews-clinton-destr_n_99619.html
Tags: Politics  
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

McCain-Clinton gas tax plan slammed!!!

 
 
 

Bloomberg Slams Clinton, McCain Gas Tax Plan

May 1, 2008 01:57 PM EST |

NEW YORK — Mayor Michael Bloomberg called a summer-long suspension of the gas tax favored by Democrat Hillary Rodham Clinton and Republican John McCain a dumb idea.

The New York mayor, who flirted with the idea of an independent presidential bid, praised Democrat Barack Obama for opposing the plan to suspend the 18.4 cent federal gas tax and 24.2 cent diesel tax during the peak driving months of the summer.

All three candidates covet Bloomberg's endorsement. The mayor has spoken highly of Obama and McCain in introducing the two at recent events in New York.

Speaking to reporters at City Hall, Bloomberg said of the gas tax holiday, "It's about the dumbest thing I've heard in an awful long time, from an economic point of view. We're trying to discourage people from driving and we're trying to end our energy dependence ... and we're trying to have more money to build infrastructure."
 
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/05/01/bloomberg-slams-clintons_n_99698.html?view=print
 
Tags: Politics  
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Reverand Wright-you are no better than the killers of Tupac and Biggy Smalls!!!

 
The ghetto punks who killed Tupac, I'm certain, in their own demon circles, are heroes for "offing" Tupac.  But what did they really do?

They destroyed a lyrical genius; one of the great story tellers of all time; now studied in the University while the killers are dying unknown in their own excrement.

Same with Biggy Smalls.  The killers yucked it up, "We got that SOB didn't we; can't come on our turf and talk crap.  We showed him.  We tough, big and bad!!!"

All because of some perceived injustice.

But what did the dirty rats really do?

They took down one of the most entertaining lyricist of all time; again being studied in the University while the rats are dying in their rat holes.

But you sir, are worse than the ghetto rats will ever be.

You took dead aim and shot Obama deeply wounding the man, with the intent of destroying him!!!

You are the lowest of the low.

For a fleeting moment, you had achieved greatness.

The Moyers interview was marvelous.  You had resurrected yourself with a brilliant self-portrait.  It was truly astounding; a Marine and a Corpsman who kept Johnson alive.  The ultimate American Dream story!!!

In that one hour you won over the American people.

Oh, nobody told you, you had won?!!!

A commentator remarked that after Moyers, the bloggosphere which had savaged you for 5 unrelenting weeks, was silent!!!

Silent!!! Do you know what that means?

It means that you had fought your enemies to a standstill; left them speechless and won over.  Even smear merchant McCarthyHannity slipped and said that he was self-examining as to whether or not he had been too harsh on you; a significant victory for you and Obama.

And then you and your lunkhead hubris went on a rampage in Detroit, with a dagger right through the heart of the Obama campaign.

Except for your saluting acting up antics at the Press Club, that speech was not that bad at all; it was the Detroit speech bomb that was really offensive.  However, you should know that the Press Club appearance played right into the hands of the racist Bill and Hillary Clinton, by keeping the Wright issue front and center.  So not only did you injure Obama, but you hurt black people by helping the racist Clintons.
 
There is no question that the Clintons played the race card in New Hampshire, "spade work" "Jesse won South Carolina too," as if to make Obama look like the black people's candidate.
 
Thank you sir for helping the enemies of black people.

And this after you had already won the nation over with the Moyers interview.

Are you listening?

You had won!!!

People who read my blog know that I do not attack people personally, but for you I'm making an exception.

Despite all your degrees, you are the dumbest man on earth.

You don't even have McCain sense.  Bush said that McCain fathered a black child causing McCain to lose the nomination in 2000 to Bush; yet McCain sought and got Bush's endorsement in 2008.

You don't even have Romney sense.  McCain called Romney all kinds of names yet, Mitt took one on the chin; pulled out of the race and endorsed McCain.

Sure Obama dissed you; he had to.  This is America; you can't go around saying G-d America without serious repercussions for the candidate.

You should have sucked it up; and chewed his butt out after he becomes President.

You know at some point Obama would have reached back and invited you to the White House, where the world wide cameras would have seen the two of you embrace; bringing wet eyes to the nation and the world; a show stopper; cementing your place in history.

But you couldn’t wait.
 
"These six things doth the Lord hate: yea, seven are an abomination unto him: a proud look...An heart that deviseth wicked imaginations, feet that be swift in running to mischief...and he that soweth discord among bretheren. Proverbs 6:16-19."
 
Search your heart Sir and erradicate those that belong to you.

You had to bring out the old baseball bat and bludgeon Obama.

Now instead of certain glory, you will be consigned to the dustbin of history along with the killers of Biggy and Tupac.

Good bye, Mr. Wright.

You could have been a contender, instead of the pretender that you are.

You were/are dead wrong!!!


 
Tags: Politics  
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Obama-Don't go for the Clinton Debate Okie-doke!!!

 
 
Clinton, Stephanopolous, Gibson ambushed you in the last debate.  They had their chance to ask substantive questions, but they wasted it on Wright, Ayers trivia.
 
If it were me, I'd tell her:  "We've had 21 debates so far.  From this point on I'll accord you the same nuimber of the debates you gave your Senate opponent, zero, or if one, we've had it.  I'll not allow you to gain tactical advantage through ambush, and setting the agenda.  The frontrunner sets the agenda.  As far my being afraid to to debate you, were you afraid to debate your Senat opponent?  Stop distracting the public with these antics, and lets solve the nations real problems?
Tags: Politics  
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (2) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Clinton's McCauliffe flip-flops on counting Florida and Michigan!!!

 
 
 

Jason Linkins

The Huffington Post

McAuliffe Has Flip-Flopped On Counting Florida, Michigan

April 27, 2008 02:44 PM

If you cast your mind back to the evening of the Pennsylvania primary, you'll remember that the Clinton campaign began to develop a pretext for the superdelegates to rubberstamp in support of her candidacy: namely, that she was winning in the popular vote. That case is not without a certain amount of speciousness (at the moment, it requires one to count Florida and Michigan, and accept the premise that NOBODY in Michigan would vote for Obama), but it's her best case to make, so she might as well give it a try.

That said, she might be well-served if some of her supporters refrained from doing the same. Perhaps you remember this moment from that evening, where former DNC Chair and Fox News Cheerleader Terry McAuliffe told Chris Matthews that he "always" counts the votes from Florida, and that Michigan counts among her big wins.

As it turns out, McAuliffe's definition of the word "always" is pretty unconventional, for it was not too long ago, he thought something entirely different. In fact, the entirely different thought he thought was something he thought so hard that he even put in a book of his other thoughts, entitled What A Party! And what a party it was! When Michigan Senator Carl Levin wanted to move up the Michigan primary in 2004, McAuliffe shot him down with swagger, belittlement, and the sorts of words he's not using these days, now that he finds himself on the other side of the fence. Via Mark Nickolas' well-chosen excerpt:

"I'm going outside the primary window," [Michigan Sen. Carl Levin] told me definitively.


"If I allow you to do that, the whole system collapses," I said. "We will have chaos. I let you make your case to the DNC, and we voted unanimously and you lost."

He kept insisting that they were going to move up Michigan on their own, even though if they did that, they would lose half their delegates. By that point Carl and I were leaning toward each other over a table in the middle of the room, shouting and dropping the occasional expletive.

"You won't deny us seats at the convention," he said.

"Carl, take it to the bank," I said. "They will not get a credential. The closest they'll get to Boston will be watching it on television. I will not let you break this entire nominating process for one state. The rules are the rules. If you want to call my bluff, Carl, you go ahead and do it."

We glared at each other some more, but there was nothing much left to say. I was holding all the cards and Levin knew it.

That's on page 325, by the way, so, if you want a refund, that's the page you want to tear out and send to McAuliffe.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/04/27/mcauliffe-has-flip-floppe_n_98857.html

Tags: Politics  
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Oregon Latinos for Obama!!!

 
 

April 24, 2008

Oregon coalition of Latino leaders endorses Obama

Senator's support of farmworkers is cited as one reason

By Thelma Guerrero-Huston
Statesman Journal

A coalition of Latino community leaders in Oregon has thrown its support behind Democratic presidential hopeful Sen. Barack Obama of Illinois.

Ramon Ramirez, the president of PCUN, the state's largest farmworker union, made the announcement Wednesday, citing Obama's commitment to improving the lives of farmworkers and Latino families in Oregon and across the nation as the reason for the endorsement.

"Barack Obama has been standing with the Latino community for more than 20 years in public service, beginning with his days as a community organizer fighting for neighborhoods devastated by steel mill closings on Chicago's South Side," Ramirez said in a statement. "Senator Obama will be a president who fights for the rights of workers and Latinos."

The endorsement came one day after Sen. Hillary Clinton of New York defeated the Illinois senator in the Pennsylvania Democratic primary and a day after her campaign announced that former President Clinton would return to Oregon for a second time on Friday and Saturday.

Bill Clinton visited Oregon on March 30 to 31 in support of his wife's bid for the presidential nomination.

About 10 days before that, Obama brought his campaign efforts to Oregon, where he picked up an endorsement by New Mexico Gov. Bill Richardson, the nation's only Latino governor. Obama's visit included a stop in Salem, where he met privately with a number of Latino groups and leaders after a spirited rally at the Salem Armory.

Nick Shapiro, a spokesman with Obama's campaign office in Portland, said the Illinois senator was "thrilled" about the Latino leaders' endorsement.

"The more the Latino community hears about Senator Obama's record of accomplishments and vision for change on the issues that matter most to them, the more they're lining up behind him," Shapiro said.

Nationally, Latinos have tended to favor Clinton and were key to her primary wins in Texas and California.

In a response to the Latino leaders' endorsement of Obama, the Clinton campaign pointed out that "prominent" Latino leaders such as Multnomah County Commissioner Maria Rojo de Steffy and Benton County Commissioner Annabelle Jaramillo have endorsed the senator from New York.

On Friday, the Latino community leaders will host a roundtable discussion on issues affecting Oregon farmworkers and the Latino community, as well as their endorsement of Obama.

The gathering will take place at 2 p.m. at the SEIU Local 503 boardroom, 1730 Commercial St. SE in Salem.

Leading the discussions will be Ramirez and State Schools Superintendent Susan Castillo, the first Latina to hold statewide office and a former state senator.

In January, Castillo joined state Treasurer Randall Edwards in endorsing Obama.

"Rather than dividing us or using language that blames a certain group of people for all of our problems, Obama talks about the need for us to work together to resolve the many issues before us," Castillo told the Statesman Journal about why she supports Obama. "Education is also very important to him."

tguerrero-huston@StatesmanJournal.com or (503) 399-6815
 
http://www.statesmanjournal.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20080424/ELECTION03/804240354
Tags: Politics  
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Obama has bridged the gap-A Kennedy a Nixon and an Eisenhower for Obama!!!

 
 
Julie Nixon EisenhowerJulie Nixon Eisenhower donated the most allowed to the Obama campaign. (Photo: Brad Barket/Getty Images)

If the children who have inhabited the White House are America’s princes and princesses, Senator Barack Obama already got a head start in collecting royal blessings with Caroline Kennedy’s endorsement earlier this year.

But soon after Ms. Kennedy made her very public endorsement at the end of January, one of her predecessors of Republican lineage made her own private one.

Yes, Julie Nixon Eisenhower is an Obama-can.

Just before the crush of states that voted on Feb. 5, Ms. Eisenhower, one of two daughters of President Richard M. Nixon and his wife, Pat, made a $1,000 contribution to Mr. Obama, according to campaign finance records. Two weeks later, she gave another $1,000. And early last month, she donated another $300, reaching the contribution limit for individuals for the primary.
 
http://thecaucus.blogs.nytimes.com/2008/04/21/a-nixon-for-obama/index.html?ref=politics

Back in 1968, just prior to her father entering the White House, Ms. Eisenhower, then 20, married Dwight David Eisenhower II, the grandson of President Dwight D. Eisenhower, in a ceremony at Marble Collegiate Church in New York officiated by Norman Vincent Peale. Nixon had been Eisenhower’s vice president, and the pair met as children.

In her decision to give to Mr. Obama, Ms. Eisenhower might have been influenced by her sister-in-law, Susan Eisenhower, who wrote an Op-Ed for the Washington Post in February entitled, “Why I’m Backing Obama,” alluding to how her grandfather, who with Nixon as his running mate, delivered the White House to Republicans after a 20-year drought, was able to attract cross-over support from Democrats.

Julie Nixon Eisenhower, who wrote a biography of her mother and is active in civic causes in the Philadelphia area, has given sporadically over the years to Republican candidates and committees, according to campaign finance records. She gave $1,000 to President Bush and another $1,000 to the Republican National Committee, for instance, in the 2004 election cycle. In the 2000 presidential race, she donated $1,000 to Senator John McCain’s unsuccessful run.

But what about her older sister, Tricia?

Politics may be contributing to a family feud. The two Nixon offspring clashed several years ago over the administration of the Richard Nixon Library, before pair settled a lawsuit in court-ordered mediation. Patricia Nixon Cox is married to Edward F. Cox, a New York lawyer who briefly ran against Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton for her Senate seat in 2005 and was Senator John McCain’s New York state chairman for the primary.

Staying true to her Republican roots, Ms. Cox gave $4,600 to Mr. McCain last year.

Tags: Politics  
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

McGovern: "Obama has very broad appeal!!!"

 
 
 

Sam Stein

The Huffington Post

George McGovern: Still Backing Clinton, But Going Way Off Script

April 25, 2008 11:43 AM

 

Former senator and Democratic presidential aspirant George McGovern says he sees some striking similarities when it comes to his run at the White House and that of Sen. Barack Obama. But ultimately, McGovern argues, Obama has organized a much wider political coalition and thus a greater chance of electoral success.

"I think that is his strength," McGovern told The Huffington Post. "He has very broad appeal. He certainly is going to galvanize the black vote. But he has strong appeal to voters of all kinds. Some of the old buckaroos out here in South Dakota are for him."

In recent days, following Obama's loss in the Pennsylvania primary, concern has been raised in Democratic circles that the Illinois Democrat could not expand his political base beyond African-Americans and college students -- a limitation that stunted McGovern's candidacy.

But McGovern, who lost the 1972 election to incumbent Richard Nixon by landslide margins, doesn't attribute his defeat to merely the contours of his political base. Indeed, he argues that his candidacy was damaged more by the infighting that occurred within the Democratic Party even after he had secured the nomination.

"After I had the nomination won and everything except the crowning at the convention, the other candidates that I had defeated in the primaries and the caucuses ganged up on me and spent the next month just bad mouthing me around the country," he said. "And, of course the Nixon people used some of the quotes and threw them back at me in the general election."

It is in this regard -- not necessarily his general election defeat -- that McGovern worries history could end up repeating itself. Noting that Obama seems poised to be the eventually nominee, though believing Sen. Hillary Clinton should stay in the race, he called for a more civil discourse between the two candidates.

"That is the one minus," he said. "I think there has been a little too much negative backbiting. And that is the one negative that concerns me because it is what happened to me in '72... I had to go into that convention exhausted, instead of spending the last few months carefully and systematically picking a running mate and getting my convention organized. We can't have that again."

This, however, is not the only similarity McGovern draws between his run for the White House and the current process. In '72, after he won the California primary and clinched the nomination, McGovern's Democratic opponents argued that the delegation should have been rewarded on a proportional basis, rather than winner-take-all. It was, McGovern says, a changing of the rules in mid-game that resulted both in the weakening of his campaign and his limping into the convention. Thirty-six years later, he sees parallels with the Clinton campaign's push to count the results of the non-DNC-sanctioned Florida and Michigan primaries.

"We can't overturn those rules now that the counting is over," he said. "I think Barack didn't even enter one contest [Michigan]. Those states knew what the rules were, all the candidates knew what the rules were, and to change it now I think is wrong."

It's not the only process issue on which McGovern, who has endorsed Clinton, finds himself at varying odds with the New York Democrat. On the topic of superdelegates, which were created as a concession to the primary reforms that McGovern initiated, the South Dakotan argues that these party insiders must take into strong consideration the pledged delegate tally.

"Yeah, I think that is important," he said. "It also reduces the frustration we would have if the candidate with the most pledged delegates was rejected. There is going to be some frustration anyway. There always is. I just hope it doesn't result in the kind of back-fighting I had to face after I secured the nomination."

Despite these differences, McGovern is not backing away from his support of Clinton. He deems her "one of the most talented, articulate and well-informed people in the country," whom he has known for 35 years, since she worked on his campaign in Texas. And he expects her to stay in the race at least until the last primary commences in his home state. But in the interim, he hopes, the tone and tenor of the campaign will be ratcheted down a notch.

"I don't want to see Hillary or Barack giving McCain ammunition in the general election," said McGovern. "It is more important that we not have another four years of Bush government."
 
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/04/25/george-mcgovern-still-bac_n_98599.html
 
Tags: Politics  
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (2) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Limbaugh creates Chaos in the Democratic Party-Gore are you going to continue to let that happen?

 
 

 

Newsmax.com


Limbaugh: 'Operation Chaos' Helped Hillary

Thursday, April 24, 2008 3:04 PM


 

Rush Limbaugh says his “Operation Chaos” played a significant role in helping Hillary Clinton achieve her 10-percentage-point victory in the Pennsylvania primary this week.

Operation Chaos is the leading radio talk-show host’s campaign to urge his conservative listeners to cross party lines to vote for Hillary Clinton. Limbaugh says the aim is to keep her in the race so she can continue battling Barack Obama and create chaos in the party, thereby aiding the Republicans this November.

“Were it not for Operation Chaos, Obama could win this by winning the primary process. But he can't now. Nor can she,” Limbaugh said on Wednesday.

“Both of these candidates need unelected superdelegates to be the nominee.

“So, unelected party hacks . . . are gonna choose the nominee. All the people that have voted in these primaries up to now will not be a factor. The nominee will have been delivered by party hacks, unelected superdelegates, and that is a dream come true for Operation Chaos."

On Tuesday, Rush told listeners as voters went to the polls: “Operation Chaos is succeeding exactly as planned and meeting all objectives.”

He pointed to the tens of thousands of voters in Pennsylvania who changed registration from Republican to Democrat in the weeks leading up to the primary and suggested they were “Operation Chaos operatives.”

Following Clinton’s win, the McClatchy Newspapers reported: “One out of 10 voters said they'd changed their party registrations so they could vote in the primary, according to exit polls. They broke for Obama by a margin of nearly 2-to-1.

“Yet late-deciding voters — including those who'd long been registered Democrats — broke heavily for Clinton. One possible explanation was the flood of controversial news about Obama in recent weeks, as well as his defensive performance in a debate last week.

“Another possible ingredient in the mix was mischief: Popular conservative talk-show host Rush Limbaugh for weeks urged his loyal listeners to register as Democrats to vote for Clinton and prolong an increasingly harsh battle that might benefit the Republicans.”

On Wednesday Limbaugh told listeners Obama could secure the nomination by acknowledging the success of Operation Chaos. "What Obama has to do is go out and say this [Hillary] win is artificial and this win is phony because of Operation Chaos,” he said.

“He needs to go out there and say, 'Why in the world is everybody taking this seriously? Rush Limbaugh had his listeners register as Democrats for one day to go vote for Hillary to prolong this. We're letting Limbaugh get away with making our party look like it's in a total sewer and a mess. This victory in Pennsylvania is illegitimate, is undeserved because Democrats did not vote for her. Republicans did.'"
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/michael-carmichael/rush-limbaugh-claims-vict_b_98652.html

 

 

 

 

 

 

© 2008 Newsmax. All rights reserved.
 
http://www.newsmax.com/insidecover/limbaugh_operation_chaos/2008/04/24/90669.html
 
 
Tags: Politics  
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Marine-Wright-a genuine hero-saved the President's life-What branch of the military did Sean Hannity and Limbaugh serve?

 
 
Hannity and Limbaiugh served in what military?
 
None you say!!!
 
And now they have nerve enough to criticize a genuine hero like Reverand Wright.
 
No, no, no.  Not good job Hannity and Limbaugh-but, yes, yes, yes, go volunteer to go in the Army and fight in Iraq.
 
You love the military so much, I'm sure they would find a place for the two of you on the front lines.
 
 
Tags: Politics  
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (2) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Alright-Man up America-If it's not race-then what black man would you vote for?

 
 
You don't like Reverand Wright.
 
You did not like Martin King-you blew his neck out.
 
You did not like Medgar Evers-you shot him in the back.
 
You did not like Jesse Jackson-you did not vote for him in 1984 or 1988.
 
You did not like Al Sharpton-you did not vote for him in 2004.
 
You did not like Marcus Garvey.
 
You did not like Malcom X.
 
You did not like Stokely Carmicheal.
 
You did not like Harold Ford-you shot him down with the naked white lady ad.
 
You did not like Harvey Gantt-you let Jesse Helms play the affirmative action race card against him.
 
You did not like 4-star General and war hero Colin Powell-you threatened to kill him.
 
Yet you have elected people like Georgia's Lester Maddox whose only qualification was to take a pick axe and a gun to keep blacks out of his restaurant!!!
 
So tell me white women of America who vote for Senator Clinton, what type of black man would you vote for; and who fits that category from today or from yesteryear?
 
 
 
 
 
 
Tags: Politics  
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Chicago violence-America go to your local police station and ask to read the police blotter!!!

 
 
The blotter will show all the crimes committed in your town for that day, week, month, year-year after year after year!!!
 
So the media can choose to focus on a particular city anytime they get ready.
 
Isn't it funny that CNN is now all of sudden focused on Chicago violence?; the home of Obama.
 
America, don't fall for the okie-doke-this is part of the Clinton media strategy to scare white people by having the media to concentrate on Obama's Chicago and embarras him.
 
Rezko trial starting up all of a sudden; reporting of Chicago violence starts up all of a sudden; NC GOP attack ad-all bear the hand print of Clinton operatives!!!
Tags: Politics  
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Superdelegates tell Clinton-"Not now"-1992

 
 
 
April 10, 1992

THE 1992 CAMPAIGN: The Front-Runner; Like Voters, Superdelegates Have Doubts About Clinton

Even though Bill Clinton won four primaries on Tuesday, even though Paul E. Tsongas announced today that he would not re-enter the race for the Democratic Presidential nomination, even though many of them concede there is probably no stopping Mr. Clinton now, dozens of Democratic senators and representatives remain reluctant to endorse him.

Senator Jay Rockefeller of West Virginia scheduled a news conference for Friday to announce his backing. Senator Tom Daschle told news organizations in his home state, South Dakota, that the moment had come to rally around Mr. Clinton. But beyond that there was little movement.

Of 264 superdelegates in the House and Senate, 93, or 35 percent, have endorsed Mr. Clinton so far, according to a continuing survey by The New York Times. Most are Southern, and most made their statements some time ago. A much larger number remain officially uncommitted.

Dee Dee Myers, Mr. Clinton's press secretary, insisted that "people are starting to rally around the flag," and she mentioned Mr. Rockefeller as an example. She also said the Arkansas Governor plans to meet with uncommitted superdelegates on Capitol Hill on April 29, the day after the Pennsylvania primary, when Congress will return from the Easter recess. 'Terrible Doubts'

But Representative Dennis E. Eckart of Ohio, more willing perhaps to speak on the record than many of his colleagues because he has announced his retirement from the House, said that he and some of his colleagues had constituted an informal "Missouri caucus -- a show-me caucus" -- and would do nothing for now.

"The voters haven't embraced Clinton, so I don't see any reason why I should endorse him," Mr. Eckart said. "Look at the exit polls. People have terrible doubts about this guy, and we're talking about Democrats."

In the New York primary Tuesday, the turnout was exceptionally low, 29 percent of the electorate backed Mr. Tsongas, a ghost candidate, two-thirds of the voters said they were dissatisfied with the choice presented to them, and 4 in 10 said they doubted Mr. Clinton had the integrity to be President.

"There's no reason for us to do anything," said Representative Barbara B. Kennelly of Connecticut.

Senator Tom Harkin of Iowa, one of those who competed with Mr. Clinton in the early primaries, has endorsed him and has been campaigning for him. But Senator Bob Kerrey, another erstwhile rival, has not. "He's got it locked up," the Nebraskan said, but aides said that he would issue no endorsement as long as there was still an active contest. No Place Else to Go

One of Mr. Clinton's supporters said heavy pressure has been brought on Senator George J. Mitchell of Maine, the majority leader, and Senator Lloyd Bentsen of Texas, who may be the most influential Democrat on Capitol Hill. An aide said Mr. Mitchell had been able to give the matter only limited attention. Mr. Bentsen said on Wednesday that he might issue a statement next week, but today aides said he might not do so quite so soon.

Ronald H. Brown, the party chairman, has been phoning uncommitted delegates and others, "discussing the lay of the political territory," as he described it. He denied putting pressure on anybody, but others in the party said he was sending a subtle but clear message that it was time to halt the squabbling.
 
http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9E0CE1DA133FF933A25757C0A964958260&sec=&spon=&pagewanted=all
Tags: Politics  
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive