Posted by
Black Knight on Saturday, April 19, 2008 3:09:48 PM
First of all, Ayers made no reported statement about 911, on 911, period!!!
If this statement of Ayer's was printed in the New York Times on 911, then Ayer's could not have been talking about 911.
Sarah Baxter-4/13/2008-Timesonline
"In an interview in The New York Times on the day of the September 11 attacks, when he was promoting Fugitive Days, his book on the Weathermen, Ayers said: “I don’t regret setting bombs,” and added: “I feel we didn’t do enough.”
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/us_and_americas/us_elections/article3736043.ece
***
Hannity has been smearing Obama with the above statement as if Ayers agrees with the 911 terrorist and feels "like he( and they) didn't do enough."
Nothing could be further from the truth.
The Ayers statement was made before 911 but published on 911.
One cannot talk about an event that has not happened, before it happens. The thought of that doesn't make any sense; and for Hannity and others to make that arguement makes one wonder how in the heck did they make it out of grade school, let alone make upwards of $50 million a year to present such gutter-garbage.
In order for Hannity to be remotely correct, Ayers would have had to have made the statement on 912, the day after 911.
There is no evidence that Ayers agrees with the 911 terrorists.
And there is no evidence that Obama agrees with either the 911 terrorists or Ayers.
But the Clinton-Clinton-Stephanopolous-Mike Savage-Limbaugh-Bush-Lieberman-
Mark Penn-Charlie Black-McCain-Kristol-Charles Gibson-(McCarthy)Hannity-Allan (puny defense of Obama) Colmes-Joe Scarborough-Karl Rove-Newt Gingrich- axis Operation Overlord-Normandy attack against Obama rolls on, without fact checking or critical analysis by the media.